In his first week in office, President Donald Trump preempted a series of executive actions to challenge the “gender ideology” in American institutions and to create a “fundamental, uncontroversial reality” that is rooted in “a fundamental and indisputable reality.” Delivered on an important campaign promise to promote ‘biological truth’.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is poised to rule on two important gender-related cases this year, and Trump’s new enforcement case could spell further controversy at the high court.
Last week, Scotus Mahmoudv. Agreed to listen to Taylor. This will determine whether schools can force teachers to read LGBTQ books to elementary school students despite parents’ objections. The question is whether parents have the right to choose their children from such instructions.
“If the Supreme Court is doing its job, it should have no impact [the case decisions] “He did exactly what he did,” Sarah Marshall Perry, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital in an interview. [former President Joe] Biden did so with an executive order expanding gender to include gender identities. ”
Trump signs dozens of executive orders, fulfills many but not all campaign promises
LGBT demonstration outside the Supreme Court. Inset President Donald Trump signs executive order. (Getty Images)
Perry noted the separation of powers between the executive and judicial branches, adding that while the executive is largely political, the judiciary is apolitical.
Scotus was obliged to focus solely on the facts presented in the case before them, stating that they were obligated to focus solely on the facts presented in the case before them, and that they “understood the parameters of the Parental Rights Guidance regarding school curriculum and precisely what constitutes a curriculum for opt-out purposes.” Questions related to what constitutes “gender medicine and age- and medical-based restrictions that affect individuals who are transgender violate the Equal Protection Clause.”
She also noted that executive orders should not influence the Supreme Court’s decision-making, adding, “The executive orders should have no bearing whatsoever on what the Supreme Court decides going forward.”
Pro-life activist indicted by Biden dodge reacts to Trump’s pardon: ‘I want to give him a hug’
Protesters gather outside the Supreme Court building as they hear oral arguments in Washington, D.C. (Jack Gruber/USA Today)
In another case, for which we have already heard oral arguments last year, Skrmettiv. US, High Court considers whether Equal Protection Clause, which guarantees equal treatment under the law for individuals in similar situations, prevents health care providers from prohibiting them from providing health care . Puberty blockers and hormone therapy for children seeking transgender surgical treatment.
The Biden administration joined the lawsuit by filing a petition with the Supreme Court in November 2023.
“I think the American people are happy to have a president who is generally sensible, who recognizes biological reality, who recognizes civil rights law and the rule of law itself. Someone who was willing to stand in our gap through the Department of Justice if the case reached the Supreme Court,” Perry said. “But I think parents should be involved so that they can bring more legal challenges.”
Pro-life protester pardoned by Trump, Fox confirms
On December 4, 2024, the United States Supreme Court v. Activists for trans rights protest at US Supreme Court before Skrmetti case begins
“I think this election is going to change not just politically, but philosophically for a lot of people, because America is going from the perilous brink of even understanding what it means to be a man and a woman. Even realizing what it means to live amicably in a pluralistic society, Perry said, “Thank goodness we’re getting back to those years.” I think we are seeing a rebirth of useful ideas.”
Trump’s executive order, signed on Inauguration Day and titled “Defending Women from Gender Ideological Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” states that the United States is based on immutable biological characteristics. declares that it recognizes only two genders (male and female).
Click here to get the Fox News app
It prohibits the use of gender identity in legal and administrative contexts and requires federal agencies, including those that oversee housing, prisons, and education, to adhere to this definition when enforcing laws and issuing regulations. is required. The order directs changes to government-issued identification documents, prohibits the promotion of “gender ideology” in federal programs, rescinds previous enforcement actions promoting inclusion of gender identities, and forces federal agencies to implement new policies. Directs the elimination of any guidance or regulations that conflict with the.
Trump’s executive order reverses a Biden administration executive order signed in 2021 entitled “Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation,” which requires federal agencies to interpret civil rights laws and It directed that discrimination based on gender identity and sexuality be prohibited. orientation.
Jamie Joseph is a writer who covers politics. She leads Fox News digital coverage of the Senate.
Source link
