According to the California Judiciary Commission, judges in Los Angeles County Superior Court were advised after entering other judges’ private meeting rooms and passing papers and computers.
The Independent State Agency, which is responsible for investigating complaints of judicial misconduct and state court judge disciplinary complaints this week issued a public warning about Justice Deishan L. Mitchell, who said she was accused of Dennis McLinn. Kathleen Blanchard without permission in 2023, who said he repeatedly entered the meeting room of Judge Bennett and Judge Judge oversight.
McLaughlin Bennett and Blanchard work for Michael D. Antonovic Antelope Valley Court in Lancaster. At the time of the incident, McLaughlin Bennett oversaw Mitchell, who served as the court’s supervisory judge.
“Judge Mitchell’s actions constituted the personal observation of high standards to maintain judicial integrity and independence, and to preserve judicial integrity and independence,” said the committee member. The meeting said.
Mitchell, who has been on the bench since 2006, said in a statement that her actions “occur during periods of extreme personal and professional stress, and the perfect storm of engaging in behavior that doesn’t reflect that person.” I said it brought about. I know I am.”
“These choices are my own and I am fully responsible,” she said. “I am committed to a future that is consistent with my lifelong commitment to acting with sincerity and maintaining the highest standards of a law firm with compassion, kindness and grace.”
According to the committee, McLaughlin Bennett learned that someone had been in her room and began locking her door. She also scheduled a meeting with the court judicial officer and told them to lock their computers in the evening. Mitchell continued to go to McLaughlin Bennett’s room, according to the committee.
Mitchell also entered Blanchard’s room in 2023 using the master key, the committee wrote. She tried to enter Blanchard’s computer and passed through the documents on the desk, the committee found.
In Mitchell’s response to an investigation when he appeared before the committee, she refuted her “completely unacceptable conduct” and “lost a path during the stress that affected her mental health. “He said.
Mitchell also made “incorrect” and “unsigned” comments regarding the defendant’s physical appearance, the committee wrote.
On June 22, 2023, Mitchell made his main side a case involving Stuart Cooper Young, who was charged with sexual offences against a child. Young’s lawyers negotiated a plea deal that involved Young posing less accusations in less prison time.
Mitchell commented on Young’s appearance, and those charged with sexual offences against children are “not treated well in prison,” the committee wrote.
“You’re a young man. You’re a handsome guy, you’re very well built, you’re attractive in a state prison, it’s thinking that you’re there, potentially 18 It’s something you need to think about until 2019,” Mitchell said. “Is that the environment you want to be happier?”
Mitchell had been warned earlier in 2010, but the committee said it did not disclose involvement in breeding dogs while dealing with criminal cases, including dog abuse.
Source link
