The state’s legal action against Norwalk over the 2024 ordinance could put a suspension on new homeless shelters and other housing projects.
“The petitioner is right that there is a great public interest in ensuring that the city does not enact ordinances that violate state law,” Los Angeles Superior Court Judge James Charfant said he was finalised after hearing Tuesday’s argument. I wrote this in the tentative ruling decided.
However, the judge was also critical of the state’s actions in the case.
“The petitioner filed accused the court of law and insisted on the invalidation of the moratorium without asserting the fact of pressing serious difficulties,” the judge said in the city for 30 days to file a response to the petition. I wrote this while giving to the city.
In their court documents, city lawyers, known as the state-figureed lawsuit filed on behalf of the Department of Housing and Community Development, filed a petition for “red herring.”
“The petitioner is trying to void and maintain a suspension that has already remained and is currently not enforced by the city,” the city’s lawyer argued.
In October, the state officially declared Norwalk violated national housing requirements and cut state funding to the state for housing and anti-homeless projects.
The city council initially approved the ordinance in August and posted a 45-day moratorium on emergency shelters, single room occupying units, supportive and transitional homes.
That prompted Governor Gavin Newsom in September to warn the city that he was violating state law, and he urged.
A city that reverses the direction.
However, the city council voted to double that stance and extend the moratorium for another 10 months. However, in October, the council voted to continue enforcement of the moratorium in order to find a solution with the state.
Norwalk passed the moratorium by citing the Housing Crisis Act. This allows urban and local governments to issue a ban on residential facilities if there is a “immediate threat” to public health and safety.
State officials have rejected the allegation that there is any threat.
Norwalk is issuing permits to 175 housing units during the current “Housing Element Cycle,” according to the state. This is only 3.5% of the allocated allocation of 5,034 units required to ensure adequate housing for the community.
“Despite receiving some warnings, the city of Norwalk refused to abolish the illegal ban on new aid housing for the most vulnerable residents,” Attorney General Rob Bonta said in the incident. said when it was submitted on November 4th.
“All cities and counties in California have a legal obligation to resolve the homeless crisis. All citizens with the authority to approve or disapprove housing should take their duties seriously. We cannot guarantee it.” Bonta has been added.
The state argues that the ban on city shelter projects violates several laws, including affirmatively promoting the Housing Crisis Act, the Fair Housing and the Housing Elements Act.
In a statement, the city of Norwalk wrote:
“During yesterday’s decision by Los Angeles County Superior Court, the judge’s statement highlights the lack of pressing or serious difficulties — resonating with Norwalk’s consistent position, and Find a common position of the city’s efforts to protect our residents and maintain local control over land use within Norwalk’s jurisdiction, of course, against the moratorium already pending by the state. It is in the fact that we are promoting action, protest, there are no further challenges. The nation is a partner in this process and does not recognize that it cannot be removed about the issue of homeless housing. Addressed in cities The City of Norwalk is committed to transparency and is ready to work with California and its agencies to develop thoughtful and sustainable policies that honor both the law and the well-being of its residents.
Source link
