The Supreme Court on Monday granted President Donald Trump’s request to ban executives from using the War Immigration Act of 1798 to immediately enforce Venezuelan citizens.
A high court judge ruled 5-4 to grant the administration’s demand to lift the stay in a temporary victory for Trump and his allies.
The issue was that the alien enemy law, or the immigration law passed by Congress in 1789, quickly passed to remove certain immigrants from the soil of the United States.
Prior to Trump’s second White House term, it was only called three times in US history: during the war in 1812, during World War I, and more recently World War II.
Judge Boasberg believes Trump’s administrators are lightly emptying.
Trump administration lawyers have urged courts to destroy lower court rulings, arguing that the Supreme Court “contains the ability to “reject” the agenda of their immigrants, including their ability to protect them from foreign terrorist organizations, and risk debilitating the effects of sensitive foreign negotiations.”
Supreme Court justice posing for official Supreme Court photos. (Photo by Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images)
“Today is a bad day to become a terrorist in the United States,” Homeland Security Secretary Christie Noem said in a video posted to X, adding that Trump is “right to use his authority to expel terrorists from this country using alien enemy laws.”
Meanwhile, Attorney General Pam Bondy called the “landmark” decision a “win of the rule of law,” adding that the “activist judge” in Washington, D.C. “has no jurisdiction to seize the control of President Trump’s authority to implement foreign policies and keep Americans safe.”
“The Justice Department will continue to fight in court to make America safe again,” Bondy concluded in a statement in response to the ruling.
Court of Appeals filed immigration lawsuit blocking Trump administrator’s deportation flights on alien enemies
“This is a huge loss for the madman and a huge victory for the Americans,” Vice President J.D. Vice President Vance responded following the High Court’s decision. “from now on!”
Attorney General Pam Bondy (left), Secretary of Homeland Security Christie Noem (center), and Vice President JD Vance (right) respond to the Supreme Court’s latest ruling on the Trump administration’s move to deport Venezuela gang members. (Getty Images)
The Supreme Court decision, following a temporary order from US District Judge James Boasberg last month, while blocking the use of the 1798 law for 14 days, he considered the case for its merits.
“The Nazis received better treatment than some of the migrants who were deported under the law,” Obama’s appointee Judge Patricia Millett said during the appeal hearing.
Both Boasberg and the Appellate Panels have keenly questioned Trump’s declaration of alien enemies calling for the alien enemy laws to send Venezuelan people, and the administration over the three planes that removed hundreds of migrants to El Salvador the following day.
At least 261 migrants were deported that day, but more than 100 Venezuelans were removed based solely on the 1798 legislation.
The deportation flight reportedly landed around the same time Boasberg issued the temporary suspension, raising doubts about whether administrative authorities intentionally denying the order. Boasberg has issued a bench ruling requesting flights that have already taken off to return “quickly.”
That didn’t happen.
Judge Boasberg should “reject” himself from Trump’s deportation case, GOP lawmakers argue
Judge Trump and Judge Boasberg can be seen in this side-by-side split image. (Getty Images)
Boasberg said on April 3 that he is weighing whether to decommission the court and detain certain Trump administration officials for refusing to provide information, even after the court issued repeated requests regarding deportation and the number of individuals sent to El Salvador.
Government lawyers cited national security concerns as reasons to reject court requests for information.
However, during the hearing on April 3, Deputy Attorney General Drew Ensign told Boasberg that flight information would likely not be classified. The judge urged them to question why the administration refused to provide it on four or more institutions, including the court-imposed deadlines.
“It’s pretty rough,” Boasberg silent in court.
Who is James Boasberg, a US judge at the heart of Trump’s deportation efforts?
In this handout photo provided by the Salvador government, the guard escorts prisoners allegedly linked to CECOT criminal organizations in Tecolka, El Salvador on March 16, 2025. (The Salvador government via Getty Images)
Boasberg also urged the government to disclose internal conversations with officials who may be monitoring the names, locations and agencies of individuals involved in the removal, as well as court proceedings.
The hearing marked the latest in a surge in legal battles over the Trump administration’s use of alien enemy law. Following Boasberg’s order, he requested officials to explain why civil servants failed to comply with his order to return deportation flights.
Click here to get the Fox News app
The Supreme Court decision cannot mark the end of Trump’s push to call the alien enemy law.
Boasberg is weighing potential empt crimes against administrative authorities. At the time of this writing, a preliminary injunctive hearing has been set for April 8th.
President Trump has thought up the truth socially to respond to decisions made in the post. “The Supreme Court has upheld the rule of law of our country by allowing a president to secure our borders and protect our families and our nation. It’s a great day for American justice!”
Alec Schemmel of Fox News contributed to this report.
Breanne Deppisch is a national political reporter for Fox News Digital, covering the Trump administration, focusing on the Department of Justice, the FBI and other national news.
Source link
