[ad_1]
The Supreme Court agreed to look into the Trump administration’s challenges against judges issuing national injunctions, and dated cases that could have a major impact on the president’s ability to carry out his agenda, not just the country as a whole.
This comes after three federal judges issued a nationwide injunction blocking an executive order by President Donald Trump that ends birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants.
On Thursday, the court merged three cases into one, setting up oral arguments to examine the fundamental question of whether district judges can issue rulings that affect the entire country.
The court will hear oral discussions on the case at 10am on May 15th. This comes about two weeks after the courts stopped listening to oral discussions before the break that normally begins in July.
Supreme Court hears oral debate in birthright citizenship cases
The Supreme Court agreed to look into the Trump administration’s challenges against judges issuing national injunctions, and dated cases that could have a major impact on the president’s ability to carry out his agenda, not just the country as a whole. (Getty Images)
A national injunction is a court order that prevents the federal government from implementing policies or laws that have a cascade effect that affects the entire country, not just the parties involved in the trial.
Since Trump returned to his elliptical office in January, his administration has faced hundreds of lawsuits targeting his executive orders and actions, some of which have led to domestic injunctions and stalled key parts of his agenda, including immigration enforcement.
Almost two dozen states order to sue Trump’s managers over birthrights: “Unprecedented”
The U.S. Supreme Court will be seen in Washington, DC on March 26, 2024.
In March, the Trump administration filed an emergency appeal, asking the Supreme Court to narrow down three injunctions issued to stop the invalidation of Trump’s birthright citizenship. The emergency appeal required the injunction to cover only individuals who have been directly affected by the relevant courts.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Acting Attorney General Sarah Harris, the administration’s proxy Attorney General, claimed on an emergency appeal that the national injunction had hit “a proportion of epidemics” under the second Trump administration, noting that the federal government faced 14 universal injunctions in the first three years of the Biden administration, compared to 15 people who were taken away from Trump administrators in just one month.
Not only will it affect the issue of birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants, but the ultimate court decision will have a greater impact on ultimately answering the limits of federal judges’ authority to determine issues of national and international policy.
Emma Colton and Breanne Deppisch of Fox News Digital contributed to this report.
Peter Pinedo is a political writer for Fox News Digital.
[ad_2]Source link
