Gov. Gavin Newsom made a headline on Friday about commenting that he accidentally deported Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia while trying to create news about tariffs.
Speaking at a press conference for the central Valley administration, Newsom announced a lawsuit over a highly unpredictable trade policy against the Trump administration, and answered a reporter’s questions about Abrego Garcia. He called the debate over whether the man was a gang member “a distraction of the day.”
Chaos, including the Dem-on-Dem news cycle, continued on a holiday weekend that neither the newspaper nor the Democrats wanted. Critics debated whether Abrego Garcia and his extrajudicial deportation were indeed distracting or a constitutional crisis.
“I think Americans are tired of elected officials and politicians,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), who traveled to El Salvador and was able to speak to Abrego Garcia.
Spoiler alert: I was in the production process and I was impressed that our government insisted on stopping it when it came to immigration. Of course, that’s the first step to reducing the rights of everyone.
Calling Abrego Garcia’s light-form “distraction” is completely wrong, whether it’s just a narrow question of gang membership, or, as later made clear, just a narrow question of gang membership. But what appears to be between Newsom and van Hollen is smaller than the media is playing, and some Democrats are now the most important question. Are Americans interested in the Constitution or the stock market?
Americans can hardly make up for what they worry most. Today, most people are zigzagging between fear that their life savings are disappearing right in front of their eyes and fear that their constitutional rights are in the same trash can. It’s a moment in all hands for Democrats, and there should be space to defend the rights of Abrego Garcia (and by extension all of us) and oppose the pointless world trade war that threatens to bring America into a recession.
But the controversy over Newsom’s inexplicable statement is now at the heart of democratic disparities. It’s a party of confusion that can’t decide whether to oppose an attack on democracy or whether to continue focusing on lasers on the issue of pocketbooks that appears to have finally handed over his second-term Trump.
Everyone, as there is an old proverb, it’s time to walk and chew gum.
Abrego Garcia is now somewhere in the prison in Salvador.
It may have begun a nightmare of deportation at the worst terrorist confinement centre, or in a facility where human rights observers claim to have a history of torture, rather than CECOT, but he is still trapped in a Kafkaescu scenario where he can commit crimes or leave what looks like a life sentence in a foreign prison without being asked by a judge.
According to Amnesty International, this kind of grab-and-vanish justice is common in El Salvador.
That’s a little too close as President Trump is deported and detaining people using the same tough crime stories without evidence, but Vice President JD Vance argues that the due process is too tedious and that the US needs to be scrapped for convenience in order for it to succeed.
“To say that the administration must observe the ‘proper process’ is to ask for a question. Which processes are functions of our resources, public interest, defendant status, proposed punishment, and many other factors,” Vance wrote on social media last week. “Here’s a useful test. I’m asking people who are crying at the lack of due process exactly what they proposed to deal with Biden’s millions and millions of illegals.
Yikes. Convenience to the law.
“There’s no new due process,” UCLA professor Adam Winkler told me. “The Constitution doesn’t matter if anyone in the United States is entitled to legitimate procedures or not.”
In a more thoughtful interview with podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen last week, Newsom called such a phenomenal law “the other side of the red line.”
“The founder never lived or died at this moment,” Newsom said. “And if you want to survive this democracy, this democratic republic, it must be called with clarity and belief, period, complete suspension.”
Therefore, Newsom and Van Hollen do not oppose the importance of Abrego Garcia’s case in the end. They cannot agree on how to reach voters best.
Most Americans really don’t know what the legitimate procedure is or what it means to democracy to lose it. But they understand that gas and groceries are expensive and that retirement savings are sinking like river bricks.
As Mike Madrid, a former Republican political consultant, said, yes, we need to walk and chew gum.
Walking, the economy of this analogy, is far more important, he said.
A recent poll has shown that 55% of voters disapprove of the way Trump is dealing with the economy. Another CNBC poll found Trump’s assessment of economic performance is currently the lowest ever in his political career after winning elections on economic issues.
“The fact that the Democrats are not driving tanks through that issue is illicit,” Madrid said, and he is right. The economy will win Trump in the election, and the economy could lose Republicans to the next.
Fight for Abrego Garcia’s rights?
“That’s a tough case. Because are people really defending the MS-13? Are they defending people they don’t care about in El Salvador?” Newsom said at a press conference Friday. “That’s exactly a debate [Republicans] Because they don’t want this discussion about tariffs. ”
But here, Trump’s theory of chaos becomes very effective. Those who care about democracy must fight both in the economy and in the rightful process – and more than that – because if we allow unlimited power in the administrative sector, we may not reach another free and fair election. And, of course, there is a moral obligation not to abandon Abrego Garcia.
Democrats seem to be caught up in political thinking – how to win the election – when the moment is looking for something.
Explain the ability to walk and chew gum, and why both are important to voters.
Source link
