The lawyer who represented the government’s whistleblower in the incident that led to President Donald Trump’s first blast each sued the Trump administration for “unconstitutional retaliation” on Monday after his security clearance was revoked.
Attorney Mark Zaid argued that the administration’s decision to pull out his clearance in March was retaliation for representing former Homeland Security Director Brian Murphy, who was key to the 2019 ammo each.
Murphy filed a whistleblower complaint in 2019 during his re-election campaign that Trump allegedly pressured Ukrainian President Voldymee Zelensky to investigate the business deals of then-presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter in Ukraine.
The US House of Representatives voted Trump for each of the bouncers that later that year for mistreating the power of his office and obstructing Congress, but he was later acquitted by the Senate.
Hakeem Jeffries blames Trump on Newark Airport Chaos and accuses the White House of “breaking the FAA”
A lawyer representing the whistleblower, the key to President Donald Trump’s first bullet each, sued the administration for pulling his security clearance. (Reuters/Ra Milis)
Zaid’s lawsuit, filed in federal court in Washington, DC, alleges that his decision to withdraw security clearance represents “a dangerous and unconstitutional retaliation by the US president against his perceived political opponents.”
The complaint accuses the Trump administration of violating the Administrative Procedure Act.
“Americans should not lose their livelihood or block them from representing their clients as lawyers because the president has grievances for them or embraces the person they represent,” Zaid said in a statement. “This isn’t just me. It’s about using security clearance as a political weapon.”
Attorney Mark Zaid argued that the administration’s decision to revoke his clearance in March retaliated on behalf of former Homeland Security Director Brian Murphy. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
Former VP Pence vows to speak up if President Trump leaves the “conservative agenda.”
The lawsuit cited a 2019 case in which Trump called Zaid a “threeball” at a Louisiana rally, telling reporters that lawyers were “disgraceful” and “should sue.”
The move to elicit Zaid’s clearance was “a brutal attack on sacred constitutional guarantees: the right to petition a court or federal agency on behalf of a client.” The lawsuit states that “the attack on this right is to curb Zaid’s ability to pursue, pursue and represent the rights of others.”
Trump has also revoked permissions from several other political enemies, including former President Joe Biden, former Vice President Kamala Harris, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, his own former national security adviser John Bolton, and attorneys at other law firms.
The lawsuit accuses the Trump administration of violating the Administrative Procedure Act, the First and Fifth Amendments. (Pool via AP)
Click here to get the Fox News app
Zaid urged the court to rule that Trump’s decision to cancel was unconstitutional, restoring his clearance. He has access to information classified from 1995 and security clearance since 2002.
Fox News Digital reached the White House for comment.
Reuters contributed to this report.
Source link
