[ad_1]
On Thursday, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime accomplice, Gislaine Maxwell, for several hours at the U.S. Lawyer’s Office in Florida. On August 11, Maxwell is scheduled to be a prison deposition sought by the House Oversight Committee.
As the fuss over the Epstein Files continues, the central question is whether Maxwell can be trusted to tell the truth.
Maxwell’s lawyer, David Oscar Marx, told reporters after a meeting with Blanche, “She was honest with all her questions, honest, and to her full potential.”
However, the prosecutors and judges who oversaw the 2021 trial said Maxwell made multiple false statements under oath and failed to hold her accountable for her actions. She was convicted of a minor in sex trafficking and sentenced to 20 years in prison.
“The defendant’s willingness to sworn in her conduct, including some of the acts charged in the indictment, strongly suggests that her true motivations avoid taking responsibility for her crimes,” the prosecutor said.
Prosecutors said Maxwell also lied when he was given the opportunity to admit his actions in a 2016 civil lawsuit. “When the defendant was given the opportunity to deal with her actions with a minor in the context of a civil lawsuit, she lied repeatedly,” they wrote.
Maxwell’s lawyer said at the time that “questions asked are confused, vague and inappropriately shaped.” They added, “There was no “crime” hidden in Mr Maxwell’s answer.”
After Maxwell was found guilty of Epstein’s recruiting, grooming and human trafficking charges of multiple teenage girls, Judge Alison Nathan said Maxwell had not accepted liability for her crimes.
“Today, Maxwell acknowledged the courage of his victims and acknowledged some degree of pain and suffering in the pain and anguish they expressed,” Nathan said. “What was not expressed was accepting responsibility.”
Jack Scola, the lawyer representing around 20 Epstein victims, said the history of Maxwell’s aides indicates that investigators questioning her must prepare in depth. “It’s clear to us that casually approaching an interview is a waste of time,” he said.
New Hampshire House
Prosecutors said Maxwell tried to hide his place from FBI agents before being arrested in 2021. Maxwell, the daughter of the late British Publishing’s large-scale Robert Maxwell, lived in a 4,300-square-foot timber framed house on a 156-acre facility in rural New Hampshire. Records show that they purchased a little over $1 million a year ago by an anonymous limited liability company.
After the agents passed the security guards hired by Maxwell, they saw her peering through the window from inside the house. According to court documents, the agent broke the door and entered after Maxwell didn’t respond to a knock on the door.
During the FBI search of the residence, they spotted one of Maxwell’s mobile phones wrapped in a cock. Prosecutors called for an ineffective and ineffective method of trying to block law enforcement’s cell phone surveillance.
Prosecutors said Maxwell was not free to state his liquid assets as he responded to her request for bail, following her arrest. Maxwell has listed the accounts at the UK Bank that “maximums exceed $2 million.” However, she did not disclose a Swiss bank account with an approximate balance of $4 million.
The prosecutor wrote, “As long as the defendant refuses to explain ownership or access to the vast wealth, it is not because it does not exist, but because she is trying to hide it.”
Civil Litigation
After her arrest, Maxwell was also charged with two counts of perjury, claiming that he made false statements in a 2016 civil lawsuit under oath. Prosecutors allegedly lied when Maxwell said he was unaware of Epstein’s efforts to recruit a minor girl for sex.
Maxwell also lied when he claimed he was unaware of anyone under the age of 18 on Epstein’s property, they said, and when she denied that she had sexual contact with other women along with Epstein and that Epstein had sex toys.
After prosecutors secured a conviction against Maxwell, they refused to move forward in a court-ordered trial on perjury.
Legal experts say that cooperative witnesses who have previously lied can still be effective witnesses if they have evidence supporting their claims. Giving them a compelling reason for why they lied can also boost their credibility.
[ad_2]Source link
