On Friday night, a federal court of appeals denied the Trump administration’s attempt to suspend a restraining order that would prohibit immigration officials from implementing certain types of enforcement actions in Los Angeles and surrounding counties, leaving the orders ongoing lawsuits.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to stay in a case that challenged the Homeland Security Agency’s challenge, which led to the illegal detention and disappearance of Southern California residents without warrants or legal justification, according to the plaintiffs.
The ruling effectively maintains a temporary restraining order (TRO) issued by a lower court in July. This prohibits DHS and other federal immigrants from stopping individuals based solely on race, language, location, or type of work. Specifically, the court found that using factors such as speaking Spanish and English accents, that working in industries that existed at locations such as farming sites and bus stops or were generally associated with immigrant labor is not a reasonable doubt under the law.
The lawsuit was filed this summer by a coalition of Southern California residents, advocacy groups and legal groups that claimed to have carried out individuals trapped in federal buildings on legal terms without accessing clients.
The iconic queer bar at risk of shutting down legal battles
In a statement, Mohammad Tajsar, a senior employee of the ACLU Foundation in Southern California, said the court’s decision highlighted the seriousness of the plaintiff’s claims. “The decision further confirms that the administration’s paramilitary aggression in Los Angeles violated the constitution and caused irreparable injuries throughout the region,” he said.
Annie Lye, director of the UC Irvine Law School’s Immigration and Racial Judicial Solidarity Clinic, praised the results. “This would not have been possible without the everyday people willing to fight for the rights and the rights of their fellow neighbors, colleagues and loved ones,” Lai said. “This victory belongs to them.”
Mark Rosenbaum, Senior Special Adviser for Strategic Litigation in Public Advisor, warned that if the government continues to try to overturn the TRO, “we are asking the courts to sanction racial profiling — and for the first time in our country’s history, people can be detained and arrested based solely on race and appearance.”
Angelica Salas, executive director of the Humanitarian Immigration Rights Coalition, took this control a step forward, but highlighted the human costs of enforcement actions. “The real victory is when all people who have been detained, disappeared and torn from their loved ones and communities through these illegal activities and tactics are safe at home,” Saras said.
From “Mean Girls” to Pop Stars: Reneé Rapp drops Raw New Album ahead of the 2025 tour
President Teresa Romero, a United Farm Worker, framed the decision as a victory for migrant workers. “You can’t take people away to work hard in brown, not fields, not Home Depot parking, not our clock,” she said.
Armando Gdino, executive director of the Los Angeles Worker Center Network, added:
Lindsay Tozzi Lawski, president and CEO of the Immigration Defenderslow Centre, said the ruling “reaffirms that no one exceeds the law, even in the federal government.”
The plaintiffs are represented by a coalition of legal organizations, including the ACLU Foundation in Southern California, the public advisor, Stacey Torchin’s law firm, the Immigration and Racial Judicial Solidarity Clinic at UC Irvine, and the National Day Workers Organization Network.
The case is in progress.
Source link
