The Trump administration on Thursday petitioned the Supreme Court to release massive deportation efforts across Southern California, and seeks to lift the ban on “roving patrols” implemented after lower courts ruled that such tactics were likely to violate the Fourth Amendment.
The restrictions, originally handed down in the July 11 order, masked and heavily armed agents were masked and heavily armed agents from robbing people on the streets of Los Angeles and cities without first establishing a reasonable doubt that bars were illegally in the United States.
Under the Fourth Amendment, reasonable doubt cannot be based solely on race, ethnicity, language, location, or employment.
In an appeal to the High Court, the Trump administration said Frimon’s ruling was upheld last week by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The lawyers behind the lawsuit challenging immigration tactics quickly questioned the Trump administration’s arguments.
“This is unprecedented,” said Mark Rosenbaum, part of a coalition of civil rights groups and individual lawyers who challenge the challenging cases of three immigrants and two U.S. citizens, and was hit by a chaotic arrest. “The Briefs asks the Supreme Court to congratulate anyone in Los Angeles, who happens to be Latinx, to celebrate the open season.”
The move comes just 24 hours after heavily armed Border Patrol agents snook workers outside Westlake Home Depot after leaping out from the back of a Pen Ske moving truck.
If the Supreme Court takes up the case, many now believe that similar offensive and seemingly indiscriminate enforcement measures could once again become the norm.
“Whatever has to do with law enforcement and immigration, the Supreme Court seems to be giving the president a free rein,” said Eric J. Segall, a professor at the Faculty of Law at Georgia State University and a well-known scholar on the country’s Supreme Court. “I think the courts are on the side of the Trump administration.”
The Justice Department has repeatedly argued that temporary restraint orders cause “improved and irreparable harm” to the government. California’s Central District is the only person in the country with the most populous figure, and with multiple undocumented immigrants inhabited, authorities are particularly keen to overturn it.
The Justice Department in a Supreme Court petition claimed that about 10% of local residents are illegally in the United States.
“Estimates from Department of Homeland Security data show that nearly 4 million illegal aliens are in California and nearly 2 million in the Central District of California. In Los Angeles County alone, there was an estimated 951,000 illegal aliens as of 2019.
President Trump has made massive deportation at the heart of his 2024 campaign, pouring federal funding and immense political capital into arrests, imprisonment and removal of immigrants. Justice Department lawyers told the Court of Appeals there were no policies or allocations, but administrative officials and those involved in planning their deportation operations repeatedly cited the target of deportation of 3,000 people a day and 1 million people a year.
The district and appeals courts have halted, blocked and sometimes reversed many of these efforts in recent weeks, accidentally deporting Maryland fathers back to Salvador prison, forcing student protesters to be released from ice custody, preserving the birthright citizenship of immigrant parents’ children, and “stop the construction of the Alligator Alcatraz.
However, most of the president’s immigration agenda has been tested in the Supreme Court so far.
If the outcome is at a disadvantage for Trump, some observers wonder whether he will limit the judiciary to his agenda.
“Even if they lose at the Supreme Court, I have serious doubts that they’ll stop,” Segall said.
Source link
