Justice Samuel Alito and Sonia Sotomayor snapped each other during Tuesday’s debate over parental rights in the LGBTQ curriculum after liberal justice tried to go back to the question as Alito spoke.
The High Court is Mahmoudv. A brief conflict broke out when I heard the discussion in Taylor. There, a coalition of parents tried to inform and solidify their children’s rights to choose from by reading LGBTQ-related materials in primary schools.
“The heat is growing in the exchanges between judges. Sotomayor tried to oppose Alito’s portrayal. Alito pushed back and asked him to finish it,” Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley observed with X.
Sotomayor initially asked Mahmoud’s lawyer Eric Baxter about a particular book entitled Uncle Bobby’s Wedding, which includes same-sex relationship storylines, and whether same-sex exposure in children’s books would be considered compulsory.
Parents Tell Scotus: Classroom LGBTQ Storybooks Clash with Our Faith
Justice Samuel Alito and Sonia Sotomayor snapped each other during Tuesday’s debate over parental rights in the LGBTQ curriculum after liberal justice tried to go back to the question as Alito spoke. (Getty)
“Our parents would disagree,” Baxter replied.
Sotomayor continued her line of questions to make Baxter’s objections more clear to the book. “Our objections will even be to read books that violate the religious beliefs of our clients,” Baxter said.
Alito then jumped in with additional questions related to the book.
“I read that book and many of these other books,” Alito began. “Do you think it’s fair to say that everything that’s happening at ‘Uncle Bobby’s Wedding’ is all about exposing children to the fact that there are men who marry other men? ”
Baxter disagreed with Alito’s question. Alito later said that the book had a “clear message and many people think it’s a good message,” but some said, “traditional religious beliefs don’t agree.”
Sotomayor jumped in as Alito continued his explanation.
“What a minute. Reservations are -” Sotomayor has begun.
“Let us be parents”: Supreme Court argues that parents should choose their children from LGBTQ school lessons
“Can I finish it?” Alito said.
“It has a clear moral message, and it could be a good message. It’s just a message that many religious people disagree,” Alito concluded.
When the debate engulfed, the Supreme Court seemed to be inclined to agree with its parents.
The High Court is Mahmoudv. A brief quarrel occurred when I heard the argument in Taylor. There, a coalition of parents tried to inform children by reading elementary school LGBTQ-related materials claiming conflict with faith, and solidified their right to choose them. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)
The coalition of Jews, Christians and Muslim parents with primary school students at Montgomery County Public Schools in Maryland filed a lawsuit against the school board after introducing new LGBTQ books into their curriculum as part of the district’s “inclusiveness” initiative.
The curriculum changes came after Maryland enacted regulations seeking to promote “educational equity.” According to a petitioner’s summary filed in the High Court.
The Supreme Court appears to be on side with parents in the religious freedom conflict over storybooks
Parents lost both at district court and at appeal level. The Fourth Circuit determined that parents did not show how the policy violated the initial amendment.
The incident comes when President Donald Trump and his administration prioritized education and DEI-related reforms when he launched his second term. The Supreme Court has also heard oral debate this past semester in other religious liberty and gender-related cases.
The coalition of Jews, Christians and Muslim parents with primary school students at Montgomery County Public Schools in Maryland filed a lawsuit against the school board after introducing new LGBTQ books into their curriculum as part of the district’s “inclusiveness” initiative. (Becquet/Getty Images)
The High Court heard oral debate earlier this month in a lawsuit filed in a tax cut bid by a Wisconsin-based Catholic charity. This decision may change current eligibility requirements for religious exemptions.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Fox News’ Bill Mears, Shannon Bream and David Spunt contributed to this report.
Haley Chi-Sing is a political writer for Fox News Digital. You can contact her at X at @haleychising.
Source link
