[ad_1]
First on FOX: Baby products manufacturers are challenging new federal regulations that are very broad and opposed to President Donald Trump’s agenda of governance on three-letter agencies and committees.
The New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) filed a lawsuit in Washington, DC on Thursday against the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) over new federal safety standards for infant support cushions. On behalf of Heroes Technology, the NCLA states that the committee misunderstands the term “durability” in its provision that includes items that were not previously covered by standard, such as cushions and other products.
The NCLA argues that the CPSC previously contained only items that fell on the front within the approved definition of “durability” depicted in the Act on Parliament.
Scoop: Trumpcraft plans to cut spending without Congress after closures are avoided
Baby products manufacturers are challenging federal regulatory regulations as President Donald Trump’s opposition to the governing agenda on three-letter agencies and committees. (Getty)
“We believe this is a pure case of a statutory structure that guides the authority of the agency, and we will step on their boundaries here,” NCLA litigation advisor Kara Rollins told Fox News Digital.
Through the provisions in question, Rollins said the committee was to “bypass evidential requirements to push regulations faster, procedural checks that are very important to push evidence requirements faster.”
The NCLA had previously sent a letter to the CPSC asking for the maintenance of the rules, saying it would “establish arbitrary and ineffective safety standards.” The NCLA has called for a “deferral and reconsidered” of the rules in light of one of Trump’s executive orders that order all enforcement agencies and departments to halt the issuance of new rules and regulations as reviews and approvals are pending.
“The president tells these agencies, ‘You have to do X.’ It’s not clear that they’re actually chasing what they need,” Rollins said.
Rollins said the rules not only affect Heroes technology, but “extend thousands of manufacturers.” [and] Thousands of manufacturing jobs both in and outside the United States.”
Litigation Tracker: New Resistance to Fight Trump’s Second Term through the Onslaught of Lawsuits for EOS
The lawsuit comes as the Trump administration works to engage administrative conditions through executive orders, directives and legal challenges. (AP/Ben Curtis)
“It’s symbolic,” Rollins said of the broader meaning of the rules. “If an agency is not considered, held to the standards set by law, or if it is independent and does not answer the president in its own mind, this kind of self-expansion tends to occur.”
Rollins said that while the rules apply to certain sectors of businesses and products, “there is no reality that will stop it from infiltrating further, unless there is a check of their power.”
“And one thing we’re very clear about is not that we don’t think we can’t or shouldn’t regulate our client’s products, but that Congress said it should be regulated,” Rollins said. “The council said that if you’re a durable infant good and everything else has to go through the process, and that’s our view that we should have gone through the other process.”
This is Trump’s best achievement 50 days after his oval office return
The administrative state was previously hit by the Supreme Court in 2024, when it overturned Chevron’s doctrine. (Getty Images)
Rollins and the NCLA argue that infant cushions like Case should undergo another process: “it’s more troublesome, more rigorous, more data and more fact-finding.”
The lawsuit comes as the Trump administration works to engage administrative conditions through executive orders, directives and legal challenges. In February, Trump specifically signed one order. This requires federal agencies to assess all regulations that could violate the Constitution as the administration continues to prioritize novel red tapes.
Click here to get the Fox News app
The administrative state was previously hit by the Supreme Court in 2024, when it overturned Chevron’s doctrine.
Loper Bright Enterprisesv in landmark determination. Raimondo effectively expanded its administrative power by ruling that the Supreme Court “must make an independent judgment when determining whether the court has acted within the legal authority.” The doctrine previously paid homage to the agency’s interpretation of federal regulations.
Diana Stancy of Fox News Digital contributed to this report.
Haley Chi-Sing is a political writer for Fox News Digital. You can contact her at X at @haleychising.
[ad_2]Source link
