California lawmakers are trying to restrict children from purchasing anti-aging skincare. The improved bill prohibits the sale of anti-aging skincare to children under the age of 18.
Rep. Alex Lee, a Democrat who represents Northern California’s district, has introduced a bill that will “protect children from unnecessary risks of anti-aging products.”
“Children don’t need anti-aging products. The beauty industry knows that, and some companies acknowledge the issue. But their statements say there is no realistic and meaningful behavior — There is performance and we don’t get to be responsible for it. We must stop the beauty industry from exploiting youth,” Lee said in a statement.
California invoices will require insurance companies to pay full coverage without itemized listings
Like its predecessor introduced by Lee, the improved bill prohibits the sale of cosmetics containing vitamin A, which contains retinoids and retinol, and its derivatives. acid.
With the new bill, Lee also addressed concerns critics have about proposed council failures, including complications surrounding how children are ageing. Young tweens and teenagers have not carried IDs, so they have raised their minimum age to 18.
Under the failed law, children under the age of 13 were banned from purchasing anti-aging skincare products.
The first bill was introduced after the “Sephora Kids” moniker went viral on social media. The name describes children and teens who are interested in skincare, but they tend to use products that are deemed unnecessary or harmful to younger skin. Anti-aging skincare products are popular among people within the scope of the description.
In response, beauty companies such as Dove, The Ordinary and Kiehls have released statements and social media posts about who will use their products and how they should be used.
