[ad_1]
Open government advocacy groups are threatening to sue California County, which is preparing to discuss the launch of an elected sheriff behind closed doors.
San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus, serving one of the country’s wealthiest communities, has faced a call for her removal ever since an explosive November report from a retired judge found it likely violated the county’s policies regarding relationships that contradict nepotism.
The report alleged that by 2024, the corpus had “abandoned” the department’s “exclusion” to its subordinates. The result was last year, voters were handed over to the County Board of Supervisors to empower her to remove her from the office, leading to a voting measure in June. The corpus appealed and led to an evidence hearing in August.
As part of the removal procedure, the Corpus legal team asked if the removal hearing would take place behind closed doors.
“The county should be in decline,” wrote Aaron Field, the first amended council councillor, in a letter to the County Board of Supervisors. “As the sheriff’s corpus demanded, the press and the public will violate the right to initially amend access to public lawsuits and undermine the panoply of public interest, which strengthens the public interest in enhancing public interest in transparently and unnecessary closing of San Mateo citizens from a critical stage of the process.”
The hearing is expected to start on August 18th and is expected to last for about 10 days.
Calmatters originally submitted a request to make the June deletion hearing public. This is a rejected request. The First Amendment coalition has requested an August removal hearing.
Removal of the Corpus – and her fight has shaken her department and community for almost a year, including her failure to file a restraining order to stop the lawsuit. Several cities in her county have given her government confidence votes, and unions representing both her agent and her sergeant have called for her removal.
A San Mateo County spokesman said the county will receive the Amendment Coalition letter and will announce the decision soon.
“The county has consistently expressed its view that this should be a completely transparent process, including an August appeal hearing for removal from the office,” said Efimilionis Verdech, a spokesman for San Mateo County. “But the sheriff blocked it.”
The Sheriff’s Department is still in chaos, and more recently, when Corpus placed San Mateo County Sheriff’s Sergeant on leave. The sergeant had extensive testimony in an investigation into the second county of the Corpus. The union representing the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Sergeant alleged that the Sergeant was on leave in retaliation for his testimony.
In a statement posted on the Sheriff’s Office website, Corpus denied that her actions had anything to do with the report.
“His temporary administrative leave has nothing to do with the comments or cooperation he may have provided in Keker’s report,” Corpus said in a statement.
Duara writes for Calmatters, where the article first appeared.
[ad_2]Source link
