Capricorn Clark, former assistant to music monarch Shawn “Diddy” Combs, said Combs was on his revenge mission in December 2011 after rapper Kid Cudy was also on a date with his girlfriend, R&B singer Kathy.
Armed with a gun, Combs ordered Clark to go to Hollywood Hills Estate in Coody and testified this week at Combs’ sex trafficking trial.
“‘I’m going to get dressed,'” Combs allegedly told Clark after knocking on the door of her house. “‘We’re going to kill this n—–‘”
According to NBC News, after Combs and his security team members broke into Cudi’s home, she saw that he was not there and caused a violent cycle in the Bad Boy Records Executive.
“Puff told him he had lured me with a gun,” Clark said.
Clark’s astounding testimony in the third week of Combs’ trial provided another example of control in which he allegedly acted as head of a New York-based record label, building on the premise set by prosecutors who allegedly oversaw criminal companies that Combs relied on employees and other accomplices to commit illegal activities.
Clark’s “testimony certainly helps to portray the ominous image of combs, his manipulation and forcedness, his control, violence. This is beneficial to gaining the sympathy of the judges in that it is ju-choice that this man is not good.
Combs, 55, pleaded not guilty to one count of assault conspiracy. Two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion. and two transports to engage in prostitution.
According to the federal government’s assault law, the government must prove at least two predicate crimes committed through criminal enterprises, or crimes, Chutkow said.
Cassie, a Cassandra Ventura, spent four days in the stands in the first week of her testimony and was “confined” to engage in an orchestra sexual encounter known as “Freak Offs” at Hotels and Homes, known as “Freak Offs.”
Scott Mescudi Kid Kudi testified to how his car was bombed in January 2012 after his break-in at his home in December. Los Angeles police also testified that evidence showed that the intrusion was related to a comb.
Testimony from Los Angeles police officer Chris Ignacio said the vehicle that police observed leaving the scene of the intrusion at Kid Cudy’s home was registered with one of Combs’ companies.
Another accuser who used the pseudonym “Mia” in the witness stand testified that she had worked for Combs as a personal assistant for several years, during which she sexually assaulted her on multiple occasions.
Combs was never charged with a fire bomb or sexual assault.
His defense team said in an opening statement that Combs is a “very flawed individual” who is prone to violence and jealousy in his relationship, but that sexual encounters are agreed.
As prosecutors and defense attorneys raised questions about whether the worker was a victim, an accomplice, or an accomplice, Chutkow said his intertwined relationship with his employees must deal with the employee during deliberations.
For example, Clark, who testified that he was paid $55,000 a year, said he set up a hotel room for freak-offs in the direction of Combs and occasionally procured illegal drugs on his behalf.
She testified that she was lured twice by combs and his bodyguards and exposed to a multi-day lie detector test, but defense attorney Mark Agnifilo proved an email Clark sent to combs in September 2014 for his forgiveness. She didn’t identify what she wanted to be forgiven.
The email was sent two years after Combs fired her, about two years ago before she returned to work for him again.
“Mia” testified that Combs sometimes feels like a best friend and working partner, but sometimes treated her “like I’m worthless crap.”
“There are also these elements of fear, coercion, fear and threat that are found in gangs, mafia and other criminal organizations. So I don’t think there is a need for completely voluntary co-conspirators or accomplices in their commitment to the organization.
Employees may also be willing to go, as they may recognize the benefits of being in a powerful celebrity inner circle, he added.
“That’s why we hear the concept of “thief’s nest,” Chatkow said. “They all play their own agenda, but they’re still working together to advance other criminal goals.”
Chatkow says, “It’s probably the way the prosecutor classifies this for the ju apprentice, and “Hey, we’ll want to wear witnesses like firefighters and nurses for you, but that’s not the world where the comb worked.” ”
At a bad rate, misconduct does not necessarily guarantee a conviction of assault, according to Mark Zoderau, a veteran trial and appellate counsel in New York.
“There is a lot of evidence of violence and potential criminal activity,” he said of Combs’ trial. “But all of that has yet to answer the question of whether the ju judge will find a conspiracy with the corporation.
“There is no doubt that the ju-describers can consider the so-called victim’s own accomplice in violent and illegal issues.”
Lawyer Rachel Maimin, a former federal prosecutor for the Southern District of New York, said that assault charges could be complicated, but prosecutors can prove the charges with only one witness or circumstantial evidence.
“I don’t know if they’ve met all the elements of the assault yet, but the prosecutors show Diddy will use his business and organization’s employees to commit criminal acts,” Maimin said. “They are linking crime to his business.”
If you or someone you know is facing domestic violence, seek help from the domestic domestic violence hotline at (800) 799-Safe (7233) or visit www.thehotline.org. The nation often has a hotline for domestic violence.
This story first appeared on nbcnews.com. More from NBC News:
Source link
