Dana Stubblefield was released from custody more than four years after the former NFL star was convicted of rape, and the conviction was used during the trial, resulting in the California Court of Appeals for “racist language” This was confirmed more than six weeks after the reversal was reversed. .
California Superior Court Judge Hector Ramon issued a ruling in Santa Clara on Friday, allowing Stubblefield to be free without posting cash bail, but authorities have considered whether to fill the fees. did. Stubfield must wear an ankle monitor, cannot own a firearm and is not permitted to contact the accused.
“We hope he will be home tonight,” Allen Sawyer, one of Stubfield’s representative lawyers, told the Times over the phone. “As my partner said, he’ll have a late dinner with his kids.”
Santa Clara County Assistant District Attorney Terry Herman has issued a statement to the Times.
“The ju judge unanimously discovered that Mr. Stubblefield had committed a crime for raping a woman at gunpoint. He felt that he had been sentenced to the appropriate sentence and that justice was provided. That justice has been suspended and while awaiting a decision from the California Supreme Court, we are disappointed that the judge released Mr. Stubblefield from custody, but we have been experiencing sexual assault, Safety continues to focus on victims, accountability and community needs.
Stubfield, a former defenseman of the year who spent 11 seasons with the San Francisco 49ers, Washington Redskins and Oakland Raiders, was charged in May 2016 with raping a woman at gunpoint last year. During his trial, Stubfield’s defense argued that gender was agreed.
In October 2020, Stubblefield was found guilty of using a firearm when a ju judge committed crimes of forced rape, forced mating, false imprisonment and committed the first two crimes. was sentenced to 15 years in prison.
The Sixth District Court of Appeals overturned the December conviction of Stubfield under the California Racial Justice Act of 2020. This prohibits judges, lawyers, law enforcement officers and others. , or country of origin. ”
The Court of Appeal’s decision is based on the language used in the prosecution’s final argument, and concerns over Stubblefield’s status as a well-known black man as a reason why police didn’t search his home with guns. It lists the following.
Source link
