Elon Musk handed two Wisconsin voters a million-dollar check on Sunday, and they declared a spokesperson for his political group.
“That’s a huge deal,” he told a crowd of about 2,000 people in Green Bay on Sunday night, standing on stage in a yellow cheesehead hat. “I haven’t called it. I’m here in person.”
Musk and the group he supports spent more than $20 million in support of conservative favorite Brad Simmell in Tuesday’s race. Musk is increasingly at the center of the contest, with liberal favorite Susan Crawford and her allies protesting Musk, and what they say is the influence he wants to have in court.
“I think this is important for the future of civilization,” he said. “That’s important.”
He said the state high court could take up rezonings of the legislative district.
“And if the Supreme Court (Wisconsin) can redraw the district, they gerrymandate two Republican seats into the district and take Wisconsin,” Musk said. “Then they’ll try to stop all the government reforms we’re doing for you, Americans.”
The unanimous state Supreme Court on Sunday declined to hear the last minute attempt by the state’s Democratic attorney general to stop Musk from handing over the checks to two voters.
The two lower courts had already rejected the legal challenges of Democrat Josh Kaur, who alleged that the mask offer violated state law. “Wisconsin law prohibits anyone from providing something valuable to steer votes,” Kaur argued in his application. “Even so, Elon Musk did that.”
Jamie Kelter Davis/Bloomberg Jamie Kelter Davis/Getty Images via Getty Images
On Sunday, March 30, 2025, ahead of the Wisconsin Supreme Court election at the KI Convention Center in Green Bay, Wisconsin, I was reading “Wi Not Sale” outside the US PAC Town Hall with Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who is the CEO of Tesla, reading “Wi Not Sale” behind the protesters.
However, the state Supreme Court, now controlled 4-3 by Liberal justice, refused to adopt the case as its original case. The court gave no basis for the decision.
Kaur did not immediately comment on the court’s order.
Musk’s lawyers allegedly filed the court that Musk was exercising his right to freebies and his freebies in an attempt to restrict him that violated both the Wisconsin and the U.S. Constitution.
The payment is “intended to create a grassroots movement against activist judges rather than explicitly defending the candidate,” Musk’s lawyer argued in his court application.
Musk’s Political Action Committee offered to pay $1 million a day to Wisconsin and six other battlefield states that signed petitions in support of the first and second amendments, using roughly the same tactics before the presidential election last year. A Pennsylvania judge said the prosecutors failed to show that the effort was an illegal lottery and allowed it to continue until Election Day.
The Liberal Party currently has a majority of four to three in the courts. All four liberal judges support Democrat-backed candidate Judge Susan Crawford.
Musk’s lawyer asked two liberal judges (Jil Karovsky and Rebecca Darrett) who had campaigned for Crawford about four hours before the rally began, to reject himself from the incident. His lawyers argued that their work for Crawford would create “the ghost of inappropriate prejudice.” If they refuse, it would leave the court with a conservative majority of 3-2.
Both judges declined the request and said they would write about their reasons at a later date.
One of the court’s conservative justices endorses Shimmel, who wore a hat that “makes America great again” during Sunday’s campaign.
Elon Musk’s estranged daughter applauds his transphobic comments. Over the weekend, Vivienne Wilson responds to her father’s recent post on X, referring to her by her old name and appears to be talking about her transition writing. She posted a cheeky response on her Instagram reel, covering the sound of the virus, “I look pretty good to dead b***h.” Vivienne is the daughter of Elon and Justin Wilson. Vivian’s March 20 interview with teenage Vogue recalled her parents recollections that her mother was very supportive, but her dad didn’t accept it either. “No, he wasn’t as supportive as my mother,” she said. “First of all, I had to get my parent’s consent to get my testosterone blocker because I hadn’t spoken to him in a few months. [hormone replacement therapy]. ”
Schimel said in a national television interview that he “doesn’t control any of the spending from outside groups, whether it’s Elon Musk or someone else,” and asked if Trump would all “refuse activist judges.”
“It’s exactly what I was committed to, whether it’s President Trump, Elon Musk, or Wisconsin donors and donors, supporters, voters, and that’s my commitment,” Shimmel said, “Fox News Sunday.”
The contest shattered national judicial election spending records, with more than $81 million in spending.
This is because Wisconsin’s Supreme Court is expected to control abortion rights, congressional districts, union powers and voting rules that could affect the mid-term 2026 and the state’s 2028 presidential elections.
___
Associated Press Writer Gary Fields in Washington contributed to this report.
Source link
