[ad_1]
Participate in Fox News for access to this content
Furthermore, special access to selected articles and other premium content using accounts -free.
By entering an email and continuing, we agree with the usage conditions of Fox News and the privacy policy. This includes financial incentive notifications.
Please enter a valid email address.
Is there a problem? click here.
President Donald Trump’s presidential orders have appealed to stop the end of the growing rights for illegal immigrants, but some legal experts in HERITAGE FOUNDATION in Hans von spakovsky It is completely legal and should be done based on Article 14 of the amendment. Supported by the court.
“I believe that Donald Trump is right, and I believe it is necessary to make the 14th amendment, as originally intended,” Spakovsky told Fox News Digital. “There is no doubt that there is a lawsuit against it. It will reach the US Supreme Court, and if the court has actually followed the legal intentions and history, they will support what Donald Trump did. “
Since Trump moved rapidly to conclude illegal immigrants, his most controversial movement was to issue a presidential order that ends citizenship for illegal immigrants.
“Protecting the meaning and value of US citizenship” states that “the privilege of US citizenship is not automatically expanded to the United States.” “The existence is legal, but temporary.
When ACLU begins a lawsuit on Birthright citizenship, Trump’s administrator fights: “I’m ready to face them.”
Brooklyn immigration. President Trump (Getty Image)
The 22 Democratic state -led state and ACLU, “born or naturalized in the United States, claiming that it violates the 14th amendment clause on the condition of its jurisdiction, and suggests that the order is suspended. I live in the United States.
The lawsuit “The president has no authority to rewrite or disable the form of a formal revision or formally enacted, and he has the authority to restrict US citizenship at birth by other sources. Not given. “
However, Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow of the Heritage Foundation and a authority for civil rights and immigrants, is no longer illegal or temporarily revised to Fox News Digital. The interpretation, which was never intended to be wide, led to a wide range of “birth tourism” and abuse.
He stated that the important phrases that are often overlooked today are “subject to jurisdiction.”
Trump’s House GOP allies presses the growth rights and citizenship bill after progressive anger in the order of presidential order.
On September 13, 2022, after being released from the US border guards in El Paso, Texas, the man plays with his children while waiting with other immigrants from Venezuela near the bus stop. (Reuters/Jose Lewis Gonzales)
“There are two important clauses in the 14th correction clause. One must be born in the United States, but also needs the jurisdiction of the United States, and ignore the second.” He said. “I have done a lot of research on this. The first passage of the 14th amendment and the phrase that the phrase was subject to the US jurisdiction. Is to.
Click here for immigration compensation
“In other words, the children born from aliens in this country have no matter whether they are legally and illegally here as diplomats. Land, they have their political loyalty, not the United States. He is responsible for the jurisdiction of the land of the land. “
According to Spakovsky, the 14th amendment was ratified after the Civil War to recognize the citizenship of former slaves and its descendants, but has been adopted by Congress more than 100 years later. It was not used to be awarded.
The Presidential Order of President Trump’s Rights Citizens Right is facing legal issues from 22 states.
President Donald Trump will participate in a ceremony commemorating the 200 -miles at the border with Mexico, San Luis, Arizona (Saul Robe via Getti Images/AFP).
Click here to get the Fox News app
The Democratic Party and the left -wing group are preparing to start a legal war with the Trump administration over the order, and the Supreme Court is convinced that the Supreme Court will dominate Trump’s support.
“The issue of the citizenship of the right to live will give the United States citizens’ rights to those who have no relation to the US government, our culture, and our loyalty to our society,” he said. “The first meaning of the 14th amendment is that the Supreme Court should support it because it is clearly not recognized by the citizenship.”
[ad_2]Source link
