A new study exposing a significant number of “severe adverse events” occurring among women who took mifepristone, also known as “abortion drugs,” sparked protests from the pro-life community, including experts who spoke to Fox News Digital about what research in women in the US meant.
“The biggest thing that shocks most readers of this report is how different the findings of this study are from what the FDA claims on abortion drug labels,” Katie Glenn Daniel, legal director at SBA Pro Life America, told Fox News Digital about the recently released study.
“What they found is that more than one in ten women have taken abortion pills and then go to the emergency room for follow-up care. The FDA claims it resembles one in 20 women. “This means that hundreds of thousands of American women went to hospital for complications from abortion through these abortion pills, and the FDA had not collected any information about those circumstances. So this study sheds light on what is happening, and what ER doctors are certainly going on.”
According to Mayo Clinic, Mifepristone is a “pregnancy blocker” used in combination with misoprostol, another drug therapy to end pregnancy. It is also used to manage early miscarriages as it helps prepare the body to empty the uterus.
Roe V. Wade is gone, but aborted
New research shows that a considerable number of women have been hurt by abortion medications. (Getty)
A study by the Center for Ethics and Public Policy in Washington, DC, found that the rate of severe side effects is 22 times higher than that shown on FDA-approved drug labels.
Research summary shows that approximately 11% of women (more than one in 10) reported experiencing “infection, bleeding, or another serious or life-threatening adverse event” after undergoing abortion supported by Mifepristone.
“These reports analyze the largest known dataset of real-world use of mifepristone and check out me and the doctors we see in our clinical practice. They say abortion drugs pose a great risk to women.
“We have patients faced life-threatening bleeding, infections, etc. After taking these drugs, we can now order online without in-person doctor visits to confirm their age of pregnancy and rule out risk factors. The interests of the abortion industry and their children deserve better care than these dangerous drugs.
Scoop: Republicans discuss “big abortion” rebates like planned parent-child relationships in Trump’s agenda bill
Pro-aboration rights activists are taking part in a “Rally for Our Freedom” to protect the rights of abortion among Florida in Orlando, Florida. (Chandankanna/AFP)
According to the Guttmacher Institute, Mifepristone, where the Biden administration took steps to make it available to women in the mail, is the best known abortion drug in the United States, with around 63% of all abortions in the United States in 2023 being medication abortion.
This is up from 53% in 2020.
“We knew that changes to the Biden administration’s prescription of abortion drugs involved sending these drugs in the mail. We knew that it was harmful to women and girls because there was no medical surveillance,” Daniel told Fox News Digital. “I don’t even know if pregnant women are taking these medications. There have been cases in which men order these medications and let someone slip. There have been cases in Louisiana where mothers forced their daughters to take them, even though they wanted to get pregnant.
Daniel told Fox News Digital that the report hopes that the Trump administration’s FDA will encourage action to ensure women and fetuses are protected.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Mifepristone, also known as RU-486, is a drug commonly used in combination with misoprostol to lead to medical abortions during pregnancy and to manage early miscarriage. (Getty Images)
“The drug that puts one in ten people in hospital is certainly not a drug that’s cited as not suitable for women or caring for women. I think we need to be realistic about that,” Daniel said.
Daniel also explained that the real harm from the pill is even worse than the study includes only certain years, and only women who have been covered by insurance.
“So there are a lot of women out there, including the most vulnerable women, who are excluded from this data,” Daniel noted.
“There’s a lot to see here,” Daniel continued. “We see this as a starting point for what the FDA, CDC, public health agencies and doctors need to consider. And while we need to have an honest conversation about the fact that 20 years of data shows these drugs are fatal for children, it’s also extremely dangerous for girls.”
Melissa Rudy of Fox News Digital contributed to this report
Andrew Mark Miller is a Fox News reporter. Find him on Twitter @andymarkmiller and email him with tips to Andrewmark.miller@fox.com.
Source link
