[ad_1]
The family of Uvalde School shooting victims have sued video games and media companies, claiming that the shooter was exposed to violence through these platforms before he executed one of the worst school shootings in US history.
The family sued Actisis, the maker of the first-person military shooter game “Call of Duty.”
They filed claims of negligence, assistance and harassment and illegal death.
“To put more detail: the defendant is biting a marginalized teenage boy and spitting out a mass shooter,” the outlet said.
The filing pointed out that the common thread between school shootings at Uvalde, Parkland and Sandy Hook was that they were all fucked by young men who played “Call of Duty” and used the AR-15.
The family says shooter Salvador Ramos has been exposed to a virtual version of the Daniel defense brand AR-15 from “Call of Duty.”
During a shooting at Rob Elementary School in Ubarde, Texas in 2022, 19 students and two teachers were killed and 18 were injured.
File – Reggie Daniels respects the monument at Rob Elementary School in Ubarde, Texas on June 9, 2022. (AP Photo/Eric Gay, File)
The lawsuit states that the AR-15 maker has a market share of less than 1%, but that was promoted in the “Call of Duty” game that caught Ramos’ eye.
Call of Duty is a simulation, not a game. It teaches players how to aim, reload and fire while giving repeated graphic violence to make the teenage nervous system a habit. And while the killing is virtual, the weapon is real.
The game maker “created simulations for children who praised their actual weapons and proficiency in killing,” the lawsuit states.
Uvalde’s family has also sued Meta, claiming that the shooter has won an ad on Instagram for a gun that promoted violence.
“They praise these weapons. They made young children want to buy these guns, and the younger children are very embraced with these types,” Veronica Mata, who lost her daughter to the shooting, told The Times.
The companies have filed a motion dismissing the complaint saying their products are constitutionally protected.
Activision argued that the First Amendment protects the “call of duty” as a work of art. Meta said the legal precedent would protect social media platforms from liability for third-party content posted by users and advertisers.
“Call of Duty tells a complex story that explores the real-world combat scenarios that soldiers face in modern warfare. Call of Duty is undoubtedly expressive and fully protected by the initial revision.”
A hearing is scheduled for Friday on whether the lawsuit will move forward.
[ad_2]Source link
