[ad_1]
A federal judge issued a preliminary ruling on Thursday. This suggests that the Trump administration will stop the illegal suspension and order advocates to terrorize Angelenos and arrest some migrants for forcing them to hide their local economy and cause damage.
The ruling was not made public, but a final order is expected on Friday for the incident that centered on the fight over Trump’s plan of expelling the nation. The lawsuit filed last week by immigration rights groups is trying to stop federal agents from stopping brown-skinned people and arresting them without cause, leaving them in a “dungeon-like” state without access to lawyers.
Prior to the hearing in the US District Court in Central California, Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong provided a lengthy award to his attorneys based on previous court filings in the case. The interim ruling is not uncommon, and Frimon said things could change based on arguments he heard from his lawyers on Thursday afternoon.
The American Civil Liberties Union, public advisors, other groups and private attorneys filed lawsuits on behalf of several immigrant rights groups, with three immigrants picking up at a bus stop and one being detained despite showing his identity to an agent.
Throughout the hearing, Frimon appeared to be troubled by the government’s lawyer Sean Skezielevsky and the lack of concrete evidence to refute accusations of indiscriminate targeting.
She seemed to be pushing Skedzielewski on how agents were arrested, after claiming that “these are sophisticated operations,” and saying it came from certain people being targeted.
In other cases where local and federal law enforcement agencies target people for crimes, the judge noted that there have been reports after the arrest “about why they arrested this person, how they were, what they did.”
“It doesn’t seem to be anything like that here. It makes it difficult for the court to accept your explanation because there is no evidence that it is what is happening, as opposed to what the plaintiff is going on,” Frimon said.
Skedzielewski argued that the lack of evidence is the reason the court should not grant a temporary restraining order. He argued that the government had only had “a few days” to try to identify the individual mentioned in the court application.
“We often didn’t have the opportunity to identify who even people stopped them.
It appears that Frimon was not moving. President Biden’s appointees questioned their reliance on two senior officials who played a key role in the Southern California attack. Kyle Harvick of the Border Patro, who is in charge of El Centro, and Andre Quinones, assistant field office director for immigration and customs enforcement.
Their declaration was “very common” and “didn’t really involve the pretty large amount of evidence that the plaintiffs recorded records of what we all saw and heard on the news,” she said.
“If there’s one of these people and you’ve got a report about ‘This is how we identified this towing garden, this parking lot, etc.’, that would be helpful,” Frimon said. “It’s hard for the court to believe that when you had, you couldn’t do it.”
Skedzielewski said the evidence was full of cases of suspensions, but “it’s not full of those suspensions or evidence that agents did not follow the law in any way.”
He said the agents’ actions were “on the board.”
This week, Los Angeles cities and counties were attempting to join the suits alongside Pasadena, Montebello, Monterrey Park, Santa Monica, Culver City, Pico Rivera and West Hollywood.
In their court applications, cities and counties argue that the attacks were not in fact about immigration enforcement, but rather are politically driven to “set an example” for the region to “implement policies that President Donald J. Trump dislikes.”
They cited Trump’s posts on his social media platform. It calls for immigrant staff to exercise “all power” to achieve the “largest deportation program in history” by expanding efforts to detain and deport people from other cities, which are the “core of the Democratic Party.”
U.S. Department of Justice attorneys argued that detention is legal and injunctions are not widely applicable.
“The government has a legitimate and serious interest in ensuring that immigration laws are in effect, and any restrictions will seriously infringe the President’s Article II authorities,” the government’s lawyer wrote.
Since operations began on June 6, immigration agents have arrested nearly 2,700 undocumented individuals, according to data released by DHS on Tuesday. The widespread arrests have paralyzed parts of the cities where many migrants work, including the Downtown Flower District.
The city argued that “illegal raids” prevented the implementation of critical law enforcement functions by “bypassing limited resources to determine whether armed individuals leaving unmarked vehicles are masked and leaving unidentified federal agents or hidden, unidentified criminals.”
[ad_2]Source link
