Newou can listen to Fox News articles!
A federal judge caused a massive backlash from Republicans over one big beautiful bill law provision that strips federal funds from planned parents after blocking the Trump administration on Monday:
Critics from Justice Indira Talwani said her quick decision to grant planning parents, the nation’s largest abortion vendor, was a temporary restraining order.
Tom Zippipping, a senior legal fellow at the Conservative Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital that the judge’s move was “clearly out of scope.”
“What you have here is that Congress exercises its explicit constitutional authority to make spending decisions, and you are definitely trying to exercise a district judge who says there is no need to enforce Congress,” Zipping said.
Pro-life movement faces high abortion rates three years after Dobbs
When the court hears verbal discussions about the Washington, DC medina and planned parent-child relationship, demonstrators gather in front of the Supreme Court building (Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)
Talwani, a Boston-based judge appointed by former President Barack Obama, issued a temporary order that lasts for 14 days. The provision stripped Medicaid funds from Planned Parenthood, which said it could force nonprofits to close around 200 of their 600 facilities and rob around 1 million customers from non-abortion-related services.
Congress narrowly passed the bill last week without Democrat support, and Trump signed the law on July 4th.
Talwani’s short, two-page order came on the same day Planned Parenthood sued, and only included an explanation that the nonprofit had given “just good reason” for temporary relief.
“I don’t know how fast that judge read it, but within a few hours she issued her TRO,” Jipping said. “It makes her court look like a fast food drive-thru.”
Sen. R-Utah, a lawyer and member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he believes the judge’s order is not innocent and wrong, and that it came to mind that the House could begin a perpetual procedure against the judge.
“We have the best judicial system in the world, but it is run by human beings with error. People make mistakes. But unless I missed something here, this was not an honest mistake,” Lee said. “This was a rather awful judicial stolen from legislative power.”
Senator Oaks bans federal funding for planning parents at Trump Megaville
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) will speak at the committee meeting at the Darksen Senate Office Building on January 15, 2025 in Washington, DC (Kevin Diet/Getty Images)
Bill Shipley, a former federal prosecutor who once represented the accused on January 6, proposed that the First Circuit Court of Appeals reassign the case in X.
“The only way district judges are disciplined to comply with their role is whether they are sanctioned for bravely ignoring the limits of their authority over partisan purposes,” Shipley wrote.
Talwani set up a July 21 hearing to consider discussions from Planned Parenthood and appointed agencies of the Centers for Litigation, Health, Human Services, and Medicare and Medicaid Services.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) could challenge the order on a temporary basis. DOJ Chief of Staff Chad Mizzel said the judge’s restraint order amounted to “a “outlaw overreach,” and he called on the Supreme Court to intervene.
The order comes in response to planned parent-child relationships that claim that Congress’s budget bill targets unconstitutional, planned parent-child relationships as it conducts abortions.
Federal judge suspends Trump administration’s planned parent-child rebate measures
The Texas Planned Parenthood Chapter has worked with national organizations to create a guide to excluding women from discussions about pregnancy. (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)
The Supreme Court Roev, the opponent of abortion. Since overturning Wade and passing the budget bill marked a milestone success for them, they have focused their energy on weakening planned parent-child relationships for years. Some people told Fox News Digital that it is one of several steps needed to address the obvious fact that abortion is common and even possible to increase.
A Planned Parenthood lawyer said if Medicaid doesn’t cover abortions and takes away plans for a multi-hundred-million-dollar Medicaid refund, more than half of its clients will lose access to services that do not include abortions.
He said cancer and sexually transmitted diseases are not detected, especially for low-income people, and that unplanned pregnancy is planned due to lack of access to birth control.
“The adverse public health impact of the refund clause is significant,” the lawyer wrote.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Some Democrats celebrated Talwani’s orders but did not address its legality.
House Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass. said in Bluesky that the judge from her hometown brought “some good news” to those who rely on Planned Parenthood for medical care.
“But don’t make any mistakes. Our fight is not over,” Clark writes.
Ashley Oliver is a reporter for Fox News Digital and Fox Business, covering the Department of Justice and legal affairs. Email story tips to Ashley.oliver@fox.com.
Source link
