House Republicans have announced a spending bill that will continue to fund federal agencies until September 30th, pushing Goit Aron’s strategy, which they believe is certain to spark a major conflict with Democrats over the outline of government spending.
The 99-page bill will slightly boost defense programs while trimming non-disability programs below the 2024 budget year level. That approach is likely a non-starter for most Democrats who have long argued that defense and de-evacuation spending move in the same direction.
Congress must act by midnight Friday to avoid a partial government shutdown.
R-La. Mike Johnson, speaker of the film, has raised the bill for Tuesday’s vote, essentially bold enough to vote against them and risk a shutdown. He also bets that Republicans can make the law into muscle, primarily through the House of Representatives themselves.
Usually, when government was going to keep it completely open for business, Republicans had to work with Democrats to create a bipartisan measure that both parties could support. That’s because Republicans almost always lack the vote to pass their own spending bills.
Importantly, this strategy has been supported by President Donald Trump. President Donald Trump has shown his ability to line up Republicans.
“Let’s complete this bill!” Trump said on social media earlier this week.
House Republican leadership staff outlined the measure on Saturday, saying it would allow for approximately $892.5 billion and approximately $708 billion in defence spending. Defence spending is slightly above the previous year’s level, but de-evacuation is below about 8%.
Leadership aides said the deal does not include various side contracts designed to ease spending from reductions. These sides’ agreements, which were part of negotiations between Democratic President Joe Biden and R-Calif Speaker Kevin McCarthy, allowed an extension of the debt cap when they took office in exchange for curbing spending. And under the terms of that contract, both defense and de-evacuation spending were scheduled to increase by 1% this year.
The measure does not include funds that individual lawmakers have requested for thousands of community projects across the country.
The bill does not cover a large portion of government spending, including programs such as Social Security and Medicare. Funding for these two programs is with car pilots and is not regularly reviewed by Congress.
Rep. Ralph Norman, Rs.C. says he never voted for a continuous solution. He says he is confident in the efficiency of Trump and the government, led by Elon Musk.
“I don’t like CRS,” Norman said. “But what’s the alternative? Negotiate with the Democrats? No.”
“Would I freeze my spending for six months and identify more cuts? Someone tells me that it’s not a victory in Washington,” added Rep. Chip Roy of R-Texas, another lawmaker who often voted against spending bills but supports the six-month continued resolution.
Republicans also hope that by setting up spending this year, they can do their best to extend individual tax cuts passed during Trump’s first term and raise the country’s debt restrictions to avoid catastrophic federal defaults.
Democratic leaders warn that decisions to move forward without consulting them will increase the prospect of closure. One of their biggest concerns is the flexibility that the law gives the Trump administration to spend.
“We’re a stake in the stakes,” said Washington Sen. Patty Murray, a leading Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee.
The democratic leaders in both rooms emphasize that Republicans have a majority and are responsible for funding the government. But leaders are also wary of saying how Democrats will vote for ongoing resolutions.
“We have to wait to see what their plans are,” said Chuck Schumer, Senate Democratic leader in New York. “We have always believed that the only solution is a bipartisan solution.”
Haixem Jeffries, House Democrat leader in New York, said the Democratic Caucus will meet and discuss legislation at the “right moment” earlier this week. But he threw a stronger tone on Friday.
Jeffries said Democrats are ready to negotiate “a meaningful, bipartisan spending agreement that will make working people the leading experts.” However, he said the “continued partisan resolution” threatens to cut funding for key programs, including veteran benefits and nutrition assistance for low-income households.
“That’s not acceptable,” Jeffries said.
Trump has met with House Republicans to win legislative votes. Republicans have a majority of 218-214 in the House, so if all lawmakers vote, if Democrats unite against each other, they can only afford one asylum. Mathematics will become even more difficult in the Senate, where at least seven Democrats have to vote for the law to overcome the filibuster. And it assumes that all 53 Republicans will vote for it.
Source link
