[ad_1]
On Friday, a federal judge granted a provisional injunction against some of the Trump administration’s executive orders on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI).
The injunction largely blocks sections of President Donald Trump’s orders that seek to end federal support for programs deemed DEI-related, and contracts that allow the Trump administration to promote diversity, equity or inclusion. prevents you from canceling.
Biden’s candidate, Baltimore US District Judge Adam Abelson, ruled that some of the executive orders are likely to violate the constitution and freedom of speech.
“The harm comes from the publication as a citizen and comes from ambiguous and threatening executive orders,” Abelson said at this week’s hearing, discouraging businesses working with the government from openly supporting the DEI. He added that he would do so.
Federal judges temporarily stop Trump administrators from firing 11 intelligence agents assigned to the DEI program
President Donald Trump signs the executive order in an oval office. (Anna Money Maker/Getty Images)
The ruling comes after Baltimore, the National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education, the American Association of University Professors and the Restaurant Opportunity Center (representing restaurant workers) served as president overreach and sued the president’s overreach. Masu. And then anti-free speech.
“Ordinary citizens take the brunt of their lives,” the plaintiff’s lawyer wrote in the complaint. “Plaintiffs and their members receive federal funds to support educators, academics, students, workers and communities across the country. Federal agencies arbitrari on whether grants are “equitable” or not. As they make a decisive decision, the plaintiff is left with Limbo. ”
They argued that Trump was invading Congress’s powers to defend his personal beliefs.
“But the president simply does not act on that power,” they wrote in the complaint. “And, otherwise, contrary to his suggestion, his power is not infinite.”
Trump wins a major legal victory over Pulitzer Prize Commissioners as the lawsuit moves to discovery
Trump signed the order on his first day instructing federal agencies to terminate all “stock-related” grants or contracts. He has signed a follow-up order requiring federal contractors to prove they are not advertising the DEI.
A federal judge on Friday granted a provisional injunction against some of the Trump administration’s executive orders on diversity, equity and inclusion. (Fox News)
The Trump administration argued at a hearing Wednesday that the president would merely ban DEI programs that violate federal civil rights laws.
“What’s going on is to pull back the overcorrection and DEI statement,” Attorney Aleshadye Getachew said at the hearing.
The second federal lawsuit was also filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The new complaint was filed by the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and Lambda Legal on behalf of the nonprofit advocacy organization.
The lawsuit is intended for Trump’s executive order. “End and prioritize radical and useless DEI programs,” “Advocate for women from gender ideological extremism and restore biological truth to the federal government,” “End illegal discrimination and make a contribution.” Restore opportunities based on it.”
President Trump, along with members of his cabinet in his oval office. (Washington Post via Demetrius Freeman/Getty Images)
White House spokesman Harrison Fields has said both cases are “just an extension of the left’s resistance,” and the New York Times tells the administration that the administration is “ready to face them in court.” He said he added a statement.
Click here to get the Fox News app
“Radical leftists can either swim against the tide and reject the overwhelming will of the people, or work with President Trump to advance their hugely popular agenda,” Fields said. I said that.
Danielle Wallace of Fox News and the Associated Press contributed to this report.
[ad_2]Source link
