Newou can listen to Fox News articles!
The Justice Department on Monday escalated the Trump administration’s long-term feud against federal judges who blocked or suspended some of the president’s most drastic policy priorities, accusing District Judge James Boasberg of fraud.
The complaint, reviewed by Fox News Digital, focuses on Boasberg’s remarks that allegedly took place at the US Judicial Conference meeting on March 11th.
During that meeting, Boasberg said that he “sought to inappropriately influence Secretary Roberts,” and that about 20 other federal judges at the meeting “attempted to inappropriately influence” by suggesting that the Trump administration could “ignorate a federal court decision” and that it would “stimulate a constitutional crisis.”
The complaint was directed by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondy and signed by her Chief of Staff Chad Mizzel.
Court of Appeals filed immigration lawsuit blocking Trump administrator’s deportation flights on alien enemies
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondy will talk to Washington, DC (Joe Raidle/Getty Images) on June 27, 2025 with President Donald Trump about his recent Supreme Court decision in the White House briefing room.
Fox News Digital could not independently verify Boasberg’s reported remarks at the March 11 meeting, and his office did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Officials argued that the reported statement was an attempt to inappropriately prejudice or influence Roberts, saying it “undermines the integrity and fairness of federal justice.”
The complaint was made by Boasberg on JGGv. It wasn’t the first time that it was being excluded from Trump’s main side, but asked him that it would be removed from the lawsuit filed by lawyers for the ACLU and others in March.
The complaints, and the demand to remove Boasberg from President Donald Trump’s second term’s most consequential immigration case, certainly tests the already difficult relationship between the administration and the courts.
Since Trump took office in January, senior management officials have exced or exced dozens of so-called “activist” judges who forcibly blocked or suspended some of Trump’s sweeping executive orders.
In particular, ProTrump’s legal group, founded by White House aide Stephen Miller, tried to suicide Roberts earlier this year for his role in overseeing the US judicial conference.
Boasberg, in particular, has emerged as one of Trump’s biggest enemies. On March 15, a few days after making comments included in the DOJ complaint, Boasberg issued a temporary restraining order attempting to block Trump’s use of the 1798 wartime immigration law.
Groups lined up with Trump sues Secretary John Roberts to limit court power
White House Advisor Stephen Miller, left, Chief Justice John Roberts. (Getty Images)
Boasberg ordered that all planes held for El Salvador be returned to US soil “quickly” but that didn’t happen. He later ordered a new investigation to determine whether the Trump administration complied with his orders. In April he held that the court had a basis for proceeding with a contemptible process, but the ruling was still held by a higher court of appeals that had not yet considered the matter.
His March 15th order touched on the complex legal narrative that what was brought before Boasberg’s first attempt ultimately produced court agendas related to dozens of deportations across the country, and later urged the Supreme Court on two separate occasions to “due process protection under the US Constitution,” in which hastily removed violated immigrants.
100 Day Injunction, Trial, “Teflondon”: Trump’s second term meets the biggest test in court
But it also placed Boasberg straight on the cross of Trump officials, including the president, to move to unleash the executive orders and target judges that the administration had tried to block them.
Their attacks are closely concentrated on the actions of several judges, but none of them are as bad as Boasburg, Obama’s appointee who became a quasi-judge for the District of Columbia quasi-judicial in 2002 by then-President George W. Bush.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has repeatedly used her podium this year to oppose “radical leftist judges” and accus her of stepping over their authority and undermining the power of the president.
Earlier this year, Trump suggested that Boasberg would be fired up for his actions, describing the judge as “troublemakers and agitators,” prompting a rare public responsibilities from Justice Roberts.
For some, the complaint appears to be on the right timing. Boasberg ordered the Department of Justice and the ACLU to court last week for status hearings to determine the status of the 252 CECOT plaintiffs deported from El Salvador to Venezuela as part of a prisoner exchange with Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.
Gorsuch, Roberts’ side, left-leaning Supreme Court justice in immigration ruling
Judge James Boasberg’s March 15th order prompted a complex, legal narrative that filed a lawsuit relating to deportation across the country. (Getty Images)
Boasberg ended the hearings by ordering the administration and ACLU lawyers to submit joint status updates to the court on Thursday, August 7th, and continuing to order hearings every two weeks thereafter.
When asked last week at a court status hearing, DOJ lawyer Tiberius Davis was asked if the Justice Department would comply with the court’s orders, “if it’s a legitimate order.”
Davis added that the DOJ would likely seek an appeal from the High Court.
In particular, this is not the first time the Trump administration has tried to exclude Boasberg from overseeing the lawsuit.
In March, the Justice Department asked the DC Circuit Court of Appeals to remove Justice Boasberg from diving alien enemy cases and to be reassigned to another federal judge. The Court of Appeals has never taken action on demand.
Shelter, Yes, Miss Pacman: We Judge Grill set DOJ over trance policy on a dizzy line of interrogation
White House Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt speaks to reporters at a press conference. (Celal Gunes/Anadolu via Getty Images)
The White House has repeatedly argued that lower court judges like Boasberg should not have the power to block what is called the president’s legal agenda.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Still, the first six months of Trump’s second term have been marked by repeated court clashes as the administration pushes the agenda and targets those in the way.
That sentiment was echoed by former acting director Ice and current border emperor Tom Homan. “I don’t care what the judges think, I don’t care what the left thinks,” he said in an interview earlier this year. Another battle. every day. “
Breanne Deppisch is a national political reporter for Fox News Digital, covering the Trump administration, focusing on the Department of Justice, the FBI and other national news.
Source link
