[ad_1]
Three women and two doctors are suing to block Kansas laws that override advance medical instructions for pregnant women regarding terminal treatment.
The plaintiff is currently one of those pregnant — challenging the constitutionality of provisions in the state’s natural death law that rejects the option of giving advance instructions to accept or reject medical care if pregnant women become incapacitated or become terminally ill.
Patients plaintiffs Emma Vernon, Abigail Ottaway, Laura Stratton and physician plaintiffs Michelle Bennett and Linley Holman filed the lawsuit Thursday. The clause argues that by ignoring pregnant women’s decisions on the end of life, it violates the rights of individuals to autonomy, privacy, equal treatment and freedom of speech.
CDC removes recommendations for covid vaccines for healthy children, pregnant mothers
Two doctors and three women are suing to block Kansas law that overrides medical decisions pregnant women can make about terminal treatment. (istock)
Pregnant Vernon wrote a pre-healthcare directive that states that if she is diagnosed with terminal condition after pregnancy, she would only be able to receive life support treatment if her child is to reach full term, born, born, born meaningful outlook, and has meaningful outlook, and is born without any serious conditions, which would interfere with the quality of life.
The lawsuit states that her order “does not benefit from the same level of certainty that the order provides, as the law does not give the same respect to others who complete the order to eliminate pregnancy.”
Every state has laws that allow people to write advance medical orders they will receive if they are unable to make their health decisions. Nine states, including Kansas, have provisions that override the advancement order for pregnant women.
The plaintiffs argue that the law violates the rights of individuals to autonomy, privacy, equal treatment and freedom of speech. (istock)
The doctors who participated in the law said the law requires pregnant patients to provide lower care than other patients, opening them to civil and criminal cases and professional penalties.
The lawsuit states that doctors are “deeply committed to the basic medical principles of having a fundamental right to determine what kind of treatment a patient will receive, and providing care without informed consent from patients violates both medical ethics and the law.”
New mom furious with her husband for choosing a friend or barbecue over her and their newborn
The defendants in the suit are Kansas Attorney General Chris Cobach (pictured), President Richard Bradbury of the Kansas Healing Arts Commission, and Douglas County District Attorney Dakota Loomis. (AP Photo/John Hannah)
Click here to get the Fox News app
“However, Kansas law ignores their patients’ clearly expressed end-of-life decisions and forces pregnant patients to provide lower standard of care than other patients receive,” he continues. “It calls for this reduced care without clarifying the end-of-life treatment they need to provide. It requires them to guess that they will speculate on what the law expects while they expose them to civil, criminal, and professional consequences for making it wrong.”
The defendants in the suit are Kansas Attorney General Chris Cobach, President Richard Bradbury of the Kansas Healing Arts Commission, and Douglas County District Attorney Dakota Loomis.
[ad_2]Source link
