A major Los Angeles City Council committee on Wednesday refused to make an effort to freeze rents across the city, but advanced a series of eviction protections for those economically affected by the recent fire.
By 3-1 votes, the Housing and Homelessness Commission approved a motion prohibiting landlords from ousting tenants for a variety of reasons, including non-payment of rent or the owner wants to move to the unit. Such evictions will only be banned by tenants who have been economically harmed by the fire, and the ban will last for a year.
The motion heads towards the full city council. It is unknown there that there will be a vote to pass.
Previous versions of the proposal, which includes a city-wide rent freeze in addition to eviction protection, were heard at councils last week, but there have been less protections among some council members. In fear of this, he was sent back to the committee. wide.
There have been extensive reports of price gouging since the fire broke out on January 7th, but it is unclear how much rental prices have risen across the region.
Housing and disaster recovery experts have said that thousands of houses have already been destroyed in tough markets, and their rent will increase to some extent.
Most of the lost homes look like single-family homes, so some experts expect rent to rise the most in large units adjacent to the burning area.
The council has taken several steps to protect the tenants. On Tuesday, it temporarily approved a proposal banning landlords from ousting tenants to allow people and pets who were avoided by the fire last month to live with them.
On Wednesday, members of the Housing and Homelessness Committee refused to freeze rent despite petitions from tenants and supporters at the meeting.
Instead, committee members proceeded with eviction protection. Voting in support of the proposal were lawmakers of committee chairs Adlin Nazarian, Isabel Jurad and Nitya Raman.
Councillor Bob Blumenfield voted no and is concerned that eviction protections are being swept too.
Instead, Blumenfield said he wanted them to explore paying tribute to the council to pay rent to financially affected tenants for the period of bounty affected by the fire.
Source link
