[ad_1]
The Los Angeles Police Department has investigated more than 80 complaints about officer misconduct during the protest last month, with more than half of which included claims of excessive force.
Michael Limkunas, director of the LAPD’s Specialist Standards and Standards Bureau, said 86 cases were under investigation as of Friday, including 59 cases due to the possibility of being over-extreme, including several others, including “disappointment” by officers and other serious allegations.
“We are looking at all reports that have been raised,” said Limkunas, the deputy director overseeing the Interior and Force Investigation Division, dealing with police shootings and other incidents, and other cases that resulted in death or injury.
Rimkunas said most of the claims were generated by citizens who contacted the inspector’s office or the LAPD complaint hotline, but a handful were launched internally after the department saw reports of suspicious officer actions in a report by the Times.
The department’s response to the demonstration has been criticized as forceful and indiscriminate, in a series of lawsuits by protesters and reporters advocates who argue overpower.
A spokesman for the ACLU in Southern California said the organization was contacted by more than 250 people who witnessed harming police and government agents during the protests, two weeks after the immigration attacks began last month, and they witnessed them harming police and government agents, or other government agents.
LAPD chief Jim McDonnell has committed to reviewing what happened, defending how members of his power treated him in the face of a crowd throwing bottles, bricks, Molotov cocktails and commercial-grade fireworks.
Limkunas said the internal task force, the captain, the medium EU and six investigators, were interviewing witnesses for several hours of body-worn camera video and evidence of rules destruction by officers, a process that began while the protests were still underway. The use of a 40 mm “low lethal” projectile is also under scrutiny, he said.
So far, the department has launched an investigation into three cases in which people injured by police actions require hospitalization.
Limkunas said the number of cases with injuries caused by police could increase as more people move forward. He instructed his detectives to visit the local hospital and added that they had gathered information about other potential victims who had not reached out to the department. Many protesters claim that the LAPD projectiles caused them to suffer severe bruises, lacerations and other serious injuries.
Some long-standing LAPD observers said they are considering responses as a true test of whether years of reform efforts have increased the department’s willingness to hold officers accountable for dangerous crowd control tactics that have sacrificed payments for liability in recent years.
“To stop this, we need to come across a message that this is wrong,” longtime civil rights lawyer James Desimone announced legal action by three clients who were injured by police projectiles at a press conference last month.
While LAPD’s vast system of investigating and training officers has long been faced with criticism for failing to punish bad officers for their actions, some within the department complain that they are flooded with frivolous complaints.
Several accident reports from the 2020 massive protests discovered obvious issues in the processing of departmental demonstrations, and concluded that they contributed to in-depth planning, poor training, and road obstacles.
One lawsuit filed in 2021 by the Veterans Police Captain, accusing many excessive force claims in August 2020 that resulted in conflict between Trump supporters and Tujunga rebels of the country.
Captain Johnny Smith was systematically viewed as “basically unfounded” in the face of clear video evidence that civilian complaints showed officers controlling their fierce form rounds and other crowds to protesters who did not present any immediate threat.
In an internal memo reviewed by the Times, Smith wrote that he and the investigators under his command revealed “many” use of coercion and policy violations of physical cameras, as well as concerns about biased police.
Several cases where Smith was flagged were cited in a lawsuit filed by people injured by police, including an Associated Press photographer who was hit with a beanbag shotgun round.
Smith said his decision to come forward led to a reevaluation of many complaints that had previously been rejected.
In the lawsuit, Smith allegedly, when he tried to send a memo to the chain of command in his findings, it was “intercepted” by another LAPD official and rubbed the most serious allegations.
He further accused his fellow captain of lying to an oath that said officers had fired less fatal ammunition after being attacked by protesters. Smith claimed that department leaders retaliated against him by placing him under an internal investigation.
Smith and his attorney declined to comment Wednesday.
The city has denied the court’s application.
Limkunas refused to discuss the lawsuit and said he was not authorized to discuss the pending lawsuit.
[ad_2]Source link
