What do you know
A hearing on allegations of responsiveness in the case of Lyle and Eric Menendez is scheduled for Tuesday and Wednesday in Los Angeles. The Menendez brothers’ lawyers will argue that they were restored after serving more than 30 years in August 1989 for the murder of their parents in Beverly Hills. Defence counsel Mark Jelagos said he plans to call several witnesses to testify in support of his brother. The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office argues that it is not fully liable for their crimes. If the court recommends responsiveness, the state parole board must consider the case and issue a judgment on whether to release the brother from prison.
Attorneys for Eric and Lyle Menendez argue for release this week, where a two-day restiangsing hearing begins Tuesday, which will provide a path to freedom for the brothers serving life sentences for the 1989 shotgun murder of their parents at their family Beverly Hills Manon.
A request for more time to consider the highly anticipated hearing delayed by the January wildfire and the newly elected county prosecutor’s case is set in Van Nuisse courts on Tuesday and Wednesday. The central question of the hearing is whether Eric, 54, and Lyle Menendez, 57, were repaired after serving more than 30 years of life sentence for the murder of Jose and Mary Louise Louise “Kitty” Menendez in August 1989.
Their lawyers and their families say yes. The brothers were educated, took part in self-help classes and started support groups for other prisoners in prison.
Defence counsel Mark Jelagos said he plans to call several witnesses to testify in support of his claim that the brothers should serve sufficient prison time, resent and ultimately be released. The Menendez brothers allege that the murder took place after years of abuse, including alleged sexual abuse by their father.
If he succeeds and the court agrees, the brothers will be eligible for parole immediately. The state’s parole board must consider the case and issue a judgment on whether to release them from prison.
It was not immediately clear that a judge with wide discretion in the case could potentially pass a sentence after this week’s hearing.
The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office presents a case against Resting. Prosecutors allege that the murder was committed to earn money for his parents.
A comprehensive risk assessment stated that Lyle Menendez has a narcissistic tendency, but Eric Menendez is vulnerable to the influence of others. The video aired during NBC4 News on Friday, May 9, 2025 at 5pm.
Former district attorney George Gascon, who lost the election by challenger Nathan Hochman in the November election, opened the door to responsiveness in October when he demanded that the possibility of parole reduces life sentences without parole to 50 years. Gascon said that the Menendez brothers’ lawsuit and murder trial would have been handled differently today due to the current understanding of sexual abuse and trauma and the rehabilitation of the brothers in prison for 30 years.
Gascon argued that the brothers were under the age of 26 at the time of the murder and were eligible for parole through the state’s youthful crimes laws.
However, Hochman, who took office in December, overturned the course, opposed responsiveness and claimed that he was not fully lied for his crimes, as he had not admitted that Lyle and Eric Menendez had lied during the trial. The brothers admitted to the murder, but Hochmann continued to make excuses about their actions and claimed he continued to lie about the circumstances surrounding the murder.
“Now they’re not in a position to defend us for a review,” Hochman told the judge during a hearing Friday.
The brother’s defense attorneys are confident that the judge will ignore the claims to refute the LA district attorney’s claim that Eric and Lyle Menendez pose a risk of violence, the brothers’ defense attorney said.
In the evidence, Hochman argues that Hochman is a preliminary result of the risk assessment of Erik and Lyle Menendez ordered by Gov. Gavin Newsom and carried out by forensic psychologists. The unpublished report said the brothers recently broke prison rules by smuggling internal cell phones. Hochmann said the behavior showed that it was unable to regulate his behavior. The report also concluded that it was “moderately likely” that the brothers would be involved in violence in the community, Hochmann said.
Risk assessments carried out by public safety and forensic psychology experts are typical procedures when prisoners are involved for parole. The Menendez brothers are not recommended for parole, but Newsom said risk assessments have begun to provide transparency and more information before the next step.
Jelagos filed a motion to reject Hochman’s office from the case because of what he called a bias against his brother, but retracted the motion at a hearing Friday. Hochman says his office has done nothing wrong, but he strongly opposes his defense attorneys and their arguments about why the brothers should bully the resentment.
District Attorney Nathan Hochmann argued that Eric and Lyle Menendez were not ready “yet” at a press conference Friday. The video aired during NBC4 News on Friday, May 9, 2025 on 11 A.
Also, during a hearing on Friday, Hochmann once again attempted to ask the court to withdraw the resentful petition. The judge objected and set a date for the hearing on the claim of resentment.
It was not immediately clear whether the brothers would be in court for this week’s hearing. During previous court cases, they appeared in video feeds from prison.
Ensureding is just one of the paths to freedom for the brothers. They are still awaiting the full results of the state’s parole board risk assessment ordered by Newsom’s Office. This is only part of the board’s evaluation.
The final hearing scheduled for June 13th will affect whether Newsom grants sibling tolerance. Ultimately, if the brothers are recommended for parole by the State Commission, the matter is placed before the governor for a final decision.
Source link
