Immigration children are facing bullying in a new playground. The Trump administration and its allies are trying to scare them from school.
One of Trump’s Ministry of Land Security was to abandon core constraints on immigration. For decades, the Democratic Party and the Republican government have been in the memorandum of policies, and in churches, hospitals, day care, and schools, where immigrants are limited in so -called delicate places. However, the day after taking office, the new administration has abandoned these protections against raids and arrests.
Currently, California Council is strengthening the state breakwater for immigration, customs forced and administration tactics. California has already prohibited public schools from collecting immigration information on students and family, and in December, the State Council will further demand from schools and day care to refuse ICE consent without a judicial decree. The bill has been introduced. Another bill introduced in late January uses a school emergency notification system to warn the students and parents of the immigration officer.
State law can slow the ice, but cannot disable federal law. Even if the admission was rejected, the ice was able to wait in the schoolyard or attack in soccer games. According to an estimation of the Immigration Policy Research Institute, about 5 million children in the United States live with at least one non -documented parent, and the school drop -off may be turned into a lunchy pad for expulsion of the country. there is. (The Trump administration does not say that it can recruit hundreds of millions of dollars required for large -scale immigration.)
Ending a “delicate place” policy has nothing to do with the need. Vice President JD Vans called a “violent murderer at school” when he was forced to wisdom with the fear of fear of ice school children. But the previous policy has already allowed ICE to be arrested when the ICE already elsewhere in schools or emergency situations, or when the officers did not have any other alternative.
So what are the points? In most cases, the immigrants have a flashy tough show and SO of fear. Certainly some of the goals are self -reported.
Some states and local jurisdictions were before the national security. This fall, the school district, Sogas, Massachusetts, began to demand evidence that the new life is a legal resident. The Oklahoma Board of Education has voted for parents and legal parents to demand “providing evidence of citizenship when they register children in school.” Such requirements can sound the Californians bells. Similar surveillance and immigration education were the core of the 1994 voting measures 187 promoted by Republican members, which were often regarded as the end of the state GOP.
Proposal 187 could not withstand the scrutiny of the justice. There was no similar law in Alabama in 2012. Both were stopped by Plyer vs. DOE. This is a Supreme Court lawsuit that establishes a constitutional right of equal access to public education regardless of immigration.
However, the current court has already shown motivation to reverses long -term precedents, overturned ROE VS. Wade. Thus, the conservative heritage Foundation calls for other states and districts to follow the Oklahoma and Sogas leads in hopes that the Supreme Court will reconsider the priller.
Oklahomasking’s principal of Ryan Waltars, like many people, has financially framework for the immigrant children and the “sanctuary school”. He demanded the federal government to refund to educate immigrants.
PLYLER’s decision did not agree with such logic. In that case, Texas claimed that the resources were too thin for immigration schoolchildren. However, the court pointed out that unauthorized immigrants contribute to their labor on the local economy and tax money. And that, “Texas’s savings are completely outstanding in light of the costs related to these children, nations, and nations” means “blindly in the boundary of our boundaries. “Sub -class” has been created.
Plyler’s Holding is applied today, just like 40 years ago, but is not the only institution that can stand up for students. California State Congress must pass the law to further protect schools from ice intrusion. Local schools can also directly support the protection of the community. The Los Angeles Unification School District has an essential teacher training plan and provides parents a “Know your rights” cards. These efforts cannot be completely protected from the arrest of the school site, but school staff can provide family tools to stand up for their community.
Educational leaders must also speak. Former California’s former Supreme Supreme Supreme Court, Tani Kantil Sacaue, appointed or promoted by the three different Republican governors, and the Ice Agent was afraid of the “Stalker” court of victims and witnesses during the first Trump administration. Was a warning that is planting and risking justice’s administration. If public education is similarly dangerous, you will need to hear from the school leader.
Surveillance and stalkers weaken children’s education. Attendance and learning will suffer when school feels that it is no longer safe. Native children and newcomers should not be sacrificed by reckless immigration. The state and the region must fulfill a constitutional and moral duty to educate all students, even if it means to confront the president.
Shayak Sarkar is a Professor of UC DAVIS. Josh Rosenthal is a Los Angeles lawyer representing local governments, immigrants and unions.
Source link
