Exclusive: Pakistan’s US ambassador warns of potentially catastrophic consequences if India could argue that Islamabad is an imminent military strike in response to recent attacks in the conflict-Kashmir region.
The war between two nuclear-armed states could be ugly, and Pakistan’s US ambassador Rizwan Saeed Sheikh has called on President Donald Trump to use his self-proclaimed deal maker qualification to defeat the agreement with India.
“This is one of the nuclear flashpoints,” the ambassador said in an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital. “It could be an important part of President Trump’s legacy, not by band-aid solutions, but by addressing the Kashmir conflict.”
Saeed explained India’s response to the attack in Pahargam, India. This left some Indian security forces dead, but dangerously premature and inflamed. “Within minutes of the attack, India began levelling the charges against Pakistan,” he said, noting that despite the remote location and rough terrain at the scene, a report was filed, only 10 minutes after the incident occurred.
Indian Modi gives the military freedom to act as a rise in tension with Pakistan after a deadly terrorist attack
Kashmiri Muslims will pray on the road as an Indian security guard in Srinagar, Kashmir, became guard on Friday. (Reuters/Adnan Avidi)
Pakistan claimed this week it had “reliable information” that India’s counterattack on its territory was imminent. The US Indian Embassy did not respond to requests for comment on the story at the time of publication.
The dust began with a massacre of tourists in Belgaum, Kashmir on April 22nd. All but one of the victims were Indian citizens, and India was quick to point his finger to Pakistan, which refused to file charges.
The attack occurred in a remote valley that is only accessible on foot or horses, and survivors claimed that after the attack, the shooters condemned some of the victims who supported India’s prime minister, Narendra Modi.
The ambassador warned that the region, home to over 1.5 billion people, has once again been “host-hospitalized in the war of hysteria” by the Indian government and the media, and is soon being held “breaking the drums of war.” The rival pair have traded firefights across their critically militarized boundaries since the attack.
He cited the demand for evidence that would link to the Pakistan attacks and Islamabad’s offer to participate in a neutral and transparent investigation.
“Unfortunate or miscalculation can lead to the nuclear interface,” the ambassador said. “That’s certainly not what we want in such a densely populated area.”
Pakistan fears India’s “immediate” mutilation amid growing tensions after the terrorist attack
Indian paramilitary soldiers will patrol the commercial hub in Srinagar, Kashmir on Tuesday.
Pakistan has denied involvement in the attack, but the ambassador reportedly says that the suspicious person is an Indian citizen whose home has already been attacked. He wondered why India was looking outside the border, rather than addressing what he characterized as “administrative inadequacy” in Jammu and Kashmir, territory he repeatedly called “illegally occupied.”
He also criticized India’s broader policies in Kashmir, including alleged non-resident settlements to the region, and what he called a threat to unilaterally block the flow of water from Pakistan’s rivers.
“It’s so badly illegal that it can get,” Said said. “This is one of the treaties that endured war between India and Pakistan,” Pakistan said that logging water supplies would consider an act of war, pleading with the Hague, accusing New Delhi of water terrorism.
The ambassador called on countries around the world to support lasting reconciliation.
“Previously, when the situation was at this level or tensions escalated, the international community attended the situation, but even before the situation spread completely, it captured their eyes and distracted them,” Said said. “This time, we have similar instances, perhaps in a timely manner in terms of other situations around the world. This is something we probably can’t afford a band-aid solution, but we’ll be seen with caution to address the broader issue.”
Pakistan fears India’s invasion is “immediate” amid rising tensions after the terrorist attack
Activists and supporters of all political parties, the Haryat Conference will take part in the anti-Indian protest in Muzaffarabad on Friday after India’s continued border tensions over tourism attacks in Pakistan and Kashmir. (Farooq naeem/afp via Getty Images)
India and Pakistan each control parts of the Kashmir region, but both claim it perfectly. They have fought three wars over territory.
In 2019, at least 40 Indian paramilitary personnel from Kashmir were killed in a cross-border attack by extremists. India responded with bombing targets within Pakistan.
Modi’s government revoked Kashmir’s autonomy in 2019, reverting it to Indian control and urged protest.
Kashmir has been a contested region since 1947 when both India and Pakistan gained autonomy from the UK. This region is currently one of the most militarized regions in the world. Tens of thousands of people have died in violence by local extremist groups.
However, Modi’s positive attitude in Kashmir has caused relative peace over the past five years, increasing his popularity within the country. He may feel political pressure to respond with strength to the latest dust.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Pakistan has been destroyed by terrorism for decades, and Saeed said that over the past 20 years, between 70,000 and 90,000 lives have been lost due to terrorist attacks.
“We can’t afford the instability of our neighborhood,” Said said. “We want a peaceful neighbour, but we want peace because we’ve mentioned it repeatedly at every level, at leadership level and all other levels, but that should never be misunderstood as a sign of weakness. We want peace with dignity.”
Source link
