[ad_1]
Subscribe to Fox News to access this content
Plus, your account will give you exclusive access to select articles and other premium content for free.
Enter your email address[続行]By pressing , you agree to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, including notice of financial incentives.
Please enter a valid email address.
Need help? Click here.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing a New York-based abortionist for violating Texas law by transporting abortion pills into the state.
But New York Gov. Cathy Hochul said the recently passed “shield law” protects abortion providers from prosecution in other states and sets the stage for what some are calling an abortion “civil war” scenario. The government is protesting, claiming that it is in place.
Paxton released a statement saying that an out-of-state doctor “caused serious harm” to a Texas woman, and explained why he is filing the lawsuit. This is the reason why this happens.” The state’s physicians may not prescribe illegal and dangerous abortion-inducing drugs to Texas residents. ”
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Collin County, alleges that New York state abortionist Dr. Margaret Carpenter violated Texas law by illegally transporting drugs into the state without conducting an in-person examination. Alleges he endangered a Texas woman. Determine the gestational age of the female baby.
Pro-life groups cancel after President Trump says he won’t restrict abortion drugs: ‘A serious and growing threat’
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks during a press conference in Dallas, June 22, 2017. (AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez, File)
Chemical abortions currently account for more than 60% of all abortions in the United States, but are known to carry the risk of serious complications and infections in some cases. Nevertheless, the Biden administration further rolled back regulations on chemical abortion, permanently allowing the drug to be prescribed via telemedicine, shipped by mail, and available at retail pharmacies such as CVS and Walgreens.
However, some states, including Texas, continue to restrict chemical abortions from being distributed by mail or without a doctor’s visit.
According to Paxton’s lawsuit, a 20-year-old Texas woman who obtained abortion pills from Carpenter ended up in a local hospital after experiencing bleeding and severe hemorrhage as a result of the drugs.
“Carpenter provided abortion-inducing drugs to pregnant women in Collin County, which caused adverse events and abortion complications, resulting in medical abortions,” the complaint alleges. “Mr. Carpenter knowingly continues to violate Texas law, putting Texas women and unborn children at risk.”
Georgia woman’s lawyer holds hospital responsible for delaying emergency abortion
Bottles of the abortion pills mifepristone (left) and misoprostol (right) at a clinic in Des Moines, Iowa, on September 22, 2010. (AP Photo/Charlie Neighborgal)
The lawsuit seeks civil penalties and a permanent bar on Carpenter from sending further abortion pills to women in Texas.
But New York has a so-called “shield” law that explicitly protects abortion providers from prosecution for prescribing abortion pills to patients in states where abortion is illegal. This is the first legal challenge brought by a state pitting one abortion law against another.
Hochul responded to the Texas lawsuit by saying he would “do everything in our power to enforce New York law.”
“Doctors who provide patients with the care they need should not be punished,” she said, adding, “At a time when Texas seeks to restrict women’s rights, I am committed to ensuring that abortion care is safe for everyone seeking abortion care.” “We are committed to maintaining New York’s status as a port.” It’s about protecting the reproductive freedom of all New Yorkers. ”
Judge blocks New York state Agreticia James from silencing pregnancy center promoting abortion pill reversal
Governor Kathy Hochul speaks during a press conference at the governor’s office on Third Avenue in New York on November 14, 2024. (Lev Radin/Pacific Press/LightRocket, Getty Images)
Experts believe the Texas challenge could eventually reach the Supreme Court.
Christy Hamrick, vice president of media and policy for the pro-life group Students for Life Action, told Fox News Digital that the Texas case will go all the way to the Supreme Court and the issue of national safeguards will be reconsidered. He said he was looking forward to it. About abortion pills.
Hamrick noted that although the Supreme Court ruled against reimposing abortion drug regulations earlier this year in a case called AHM v. FDA, the court has not closed the door on restoring the safeguards through another case. He said that he had made it clear.
“The Supreme Court has not said that everything that has pills in it is great and can be sold as is.” [and] “There was nothing wrong with the pills,” she explained. “What the Supreme Court said is you need to go back and start over, you came to us with the wrong victims, they weren’t doing what the court called ‘standing’. ” he explained. ”
Biden administration pressures African countries to adopt lax abortion laws in exchange for foreign aid: report
Anti-abortion and pro-abortion protesters protest outside the Supreme Court building ahead of arguments in the Mississippi abortion rights case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health in Washington, Dec. 1, 2021. Activists are separated by a fence. (Reuters) /Jonathan Ernst)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“So three states have already joined in by saying, we’re holding our ground, we’re victims because we’re paying higher emergency care costs because of these drugs. ” she continued. “A nation has the right to defend its own laws. So, ostensibly, a nation has a right to defend itself and its laws and the laws of its people and their duly elected representatives. So, yes. , they have a position.” ”
Students for Life Action recently launched its own challenge to abortion pills in the form of a so-called “citizen petition.” The petition asks the FDA to delay plans to once again expand the use of abortion pills, this time to treat miscarriage, until the agency reviews how abortion pills are contaminating the nation’s water supplies. I am doing it.
“The Biden-Harris Administration during the COVID-19 pandemic essentially created a de facto right to pollute and pathological medical waste.” [from abortion pills] It’s going into water supplies across America and no one is checking it,” she said. If you’re going to distribute more drugs without any awareness of the safety risks, that’s reckless and dangerous, and that’s what the federal government is doing.”
[ad_2]Source link
