[ad_1]
Newou can listen to Fox News articles!
Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., condemned the US Supreme Court’s decision on Wednesday to uphold a ban on transgender “treatment” for minors.
“It appears this Supreme Court has forgotten that one of their jobs is to protect individual rights and protect individuals from discrimination. That’s a terrible decision,” Schumer told reporters at Capitol Hill.
Schumer accused Republicans of trying to infringe the rights of transgender youth.
Scotus’ rules regarding state ban on gender transition for minors in the case of landmarks
Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y. will speak with reporters after a closing door party meeting in Capitol, Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, June 17, 2025.
“There was a bill on the floor that said Republicans wanted to take these rights away,” Schumer said. “And we believe that all Democrats who opposed it voted, so we failed because we needed 60 votes. So we’re going to explore all the solutions.”
Schumer also condemned the court’s 6-3 decision online.
“All the Republican cruel crusades against trans kids are attempts to distract attention from tearing health care from millions of Americans,” Schumer writes. “We will continue to fight and march.”
Meanwhile, the Republican Attorney General’s Association (RAGA) said the majority decision “helps restore the sanity of millions of families across the United States.”
“Boys are boys and girls are girls,” Adam Piper, president and executive director of Raga, said in a statement in Fox News Digital. “The Republican AG opposes the risky, irreversible gender transition procedures for minors, demise extreme donors and leans forward towards Gomora. We must continue to protect our daughter from men who try to infiltrate single space, privacy and athletic competition.”
Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skulmetti praised the decision, saying that the role that handled the case’s defense “has the common sense of Tennessee voters beat judicial activity.”
“The rapid and unexplained increase in the number of children seeking these life-changing interventions despite lack of supportive evidence calls for careful scrutiny from elected leaders,” he said in a statement. “This victory transcends politics. It’s about real Tennessee children facing a real struggle. Our state and our nation’s families deserve a solution based on science rather than ideology. Today’s groundbreaking decisions recognize that the Constitution recognizes that we serve the best calling of society.”
The Supreme Court will be seen on December 17, 2024, on Capitol Hill, Washington.
Tennessee Governor Bill Lee praised Skrmetti for securing a “historic” Supreme Court victory, adding that “protecting children is a fundamental responsibility we take seriously.”
“I was proud to sign this bipartisan law, which is proud to protect young people legally from irreversible, life-changing medical decisions,” Lee said in a statement in Fox News Digital. “Through elected representatives, voters should have the power to determine what they believe in such a serious issue.”
The Supreme Court appears to be divided into state bans on gender transition “treatment” for minors
The case is centered around Tennessee Act SB1, which restricts sexual transition treatment in minors for the treatment of gender discomfort.
The Tennessee Legislature findings detailed in the statute included that such treatment could “become irreversibly barren for minors, at high risk of illness or illness, or suffer from adverse and fatal psychological consequences.” Republican-controlled national institutions may also say that minors “a lack of maturity to fully understand and evaluate,” and may regret seeking treatment and transition.
Writing for the conservative majority, Judge John Roberts said the Tennessee case “has the weight of intense scientific and policy debates on the safety, effectiveness and validity of medical treatment in an evolving field.”
“The voices of these debates raise honest concerns. The impact for everyone is profound,” he wrote. “Equality protection clauses do not resolve these differences and we cannot afford to grant us a license to determine them as we most often see.
Conservative Justice ruled that SB1 is not subject to increased scrutiny under the equal protection clause of Article 14. They said the law incorporates two categories based on age and medical use.
Protesters against the treatment of transgender minors have been demonstrated outside the Supreme Court on December 4, 2024 in Washington, DC (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)
“Healthcare providers can manage certain treatments for individuals over the age of 18, but not for minors,” writes Roberts. “Health providers can administer adolescent blockers or hormones to minors to treat certain conditions, but do not treat gender discomfort, gender identity disorder, or gender discrepancies.
The decision states that neither of these categories have turned on sex. Rather, SB1 “prohibits health care providers from administering adolescent blockers or hormones to minors for specific medical uses, regardless of the gender of the minor.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
Justice Sonia Sotomayor opposed the majority, claiming that “they will abandon transgender children and their families on political whims,” all three liberal justices.
Daniel Wallace is a news and political reporter for Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to danielle.wallace@fox.com and to X:@danimwallace.
[ad_2]Source link
