[ad_1]
Sean “Diddy” Combs’ federal trial concluded this week with a partial victory from a music mogul who discovered that the ju judge had committed the charge of transporting for prostitution, but he cleaned up on charges that managed to keep him behind his life.
But the dramatic legal story that captivates the nation and gives us a glimpse into the life of one of the most powerful music in the country is far from far. He is still facing dozens of civil lawsuits accusing him of misconduct and sexual assault.
“This verdict will not erase civil suits that have a much lower burden of evidence,” said Dmitry Gorin, a former sex crime prosecutor and defense attorney. “Criminal cases could have been more successful in state courts with regard to what the government has actually proved, domestic violence and tor.”
And it remains unclear how much time the Comb will spend behind the bar for a prostitution-related conviction.
Ju umpire split verdict leaves a comb in prison for up to 10 years for each of the two prostitutions. Eight men and four female ju apprentices discovered that he was not committed to sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion. And it could have served life sentence. In a letter attempting to put him in prison, the prosecutors listed sentencing guidelines ranging from 51 to 63 months, or more than five years.
Gorin said it is likely that Combs’ lawyers will promote probation.
“He turns out to be liable to pay sex workers to travel across state boundaries, but at the end of the day it’s a loss to the government,” he said.
Judge Arun Subramanian has a considerable latitude in determining how much time Combs will provide. So far, Subramanians have not been easy for celebrities.
He ruled Wednesday that Combs would remain in jail until his sentence hearing at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, citing past cases of violence that his lawyers admitted during trial.
In explaining his decision, the Subramanian referenced to the testimony of Combs’ ex-girlfriend, who identified only as Jane as celebrity suffocated and dragged him in during the June 2024 debate when Combs knew he was being investigated.
“It is impossible for the defendant to demonstrate with clear and persuasive evidence that he does not pose any danger,” Subramanian said.
Combs’ lawyers offered to offer $1 million in bonds, waive his passport, get drug tests and restrict travel to New York, Los Angeles and Miami.
In a letter advocating for release, Combs’ attorney pointed out that he has an 85-year-old mother of various health conditions that would make her son her a primary caretaker, and Combs has a child and an 85-year-old mother.
“Specially given the sentencing guidelines for these prostitution charges, he has since been entitled to provide additional time imposed in low-security facilities,” his lawyer wrote.
Still, Subramanian said detention for prostitution-related charges is “essential” under the law known as the Mann Act. Although Combs’ sentencing dates have not been set, the judge proposed to hold a hearing in October.
During trial, prosecutors often portrayed comb and his companions as tempting a romantic relationship, enticeing female victims. When he gained their interest, prosecutors said Combs had used power, threats of power, forced and drugs to engage in sexual activity with male prostitutes.
The ju judge heard from three women, two ex-girlfriends and one personal assistant who described the culture within the empire that prosecutors compared to mob-style assault operations. By imposing assault on combs, the government alleged that his company, Bad boy Entertainment, acted as a criminal enterprise that threatened and abused women, and used its members to engage in crimes such as tricking, sex trafficking, bribery, arson and obstructing justice.
In the stands, witnesses testified during the performance that Combs gave women ketamine, ecstasy and GHB to “keep obedient and obedient.”
In May, as trials are ongoing, reporters asked President Trump about the case, noting that he has the authority to forgive individuals convicted of federal crimes.
Trump told reporters that no one ever asked him about a celebrity pardon. He said he had not followed the incident closely and said, “We certainly see the facts.”
“I know people are thinking about it,” Trump said. “I think some people were very close to asking.”
[ad_2]Source link
