Supreme Court Judge Neil Gorszcz scots an experienced lawyer during oral arguments in cases focused on disability discrimination in public schools.
The nervous exchange was AJTv. It was held during oral arguments at an Osseo area school. This is an example centered on whether school districts can be held responsible for discriminating against students with disabilities under the 1990 American Persons with Disabilities Act and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act.
Gorsuch scolded Williams & Connolly’s attorney Lisa Bratt, an experienced Supreme Court litigator representing Minnesota public schools, for accusing the plaintiff of “liing” in his High Court allegations.
The plaintiffs in this case represent the parents of a girl with serious epilepsy. He sued public schools in the morning for refusing to provide a home school.
100 Day Injunction, Trial, “Teflondon”: Trump’s second term meets the biggest test in court
Deputy Judge Neil Gorsuch stands in a group photo at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on April 23, 2021 (via Erin Schaff/The New York Times, pool, file)
The exchange between Gorsuch and Blatt came after she accused her of lying about her public school attitude.
The lawyer “should be more careful about what they say,” Gorsuch told Bratt in warning.
“Now, they need to be more careful with all respect when misinterpreting the positions of the best courts’ experienced advocates,” replied Bratt.
Trump administration asks the Supreme Court to review El Salvador’s deportation flight case
At the time, Judge Neil Gorsuch will testify at a Supreme Court confirmation hearing hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 22, 2017 (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
He then re-referenced the accusation of lying. “Mr. Brat,” Gorsuch told her, “I confess that I am still troubled by your suggestion that your friend on the other side had lied.”
“Okay,” she fought back. “Let’s lift that up. In a verbal discussion…”
Gorsuch cuts and says, “I think we have to do it here, and ask you to reconsider that phrase.”
“You can accuse people of being wrong but lying –,” Gorsuch said before Bratt tried to insert it.
“Master Bratt, if I might end up,” Gorsuch said before continuing: “But lies are another matter.”
U.S. Supreme Court. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib, file)
He then began to read a page of their briefs before breaking again.
“I’m not finished,” Grousi told her, yelling him out.
“Retract your accusation, Mr. Bratt,” he told her he was lying.
“Great, I’m going to retreat,” she shot.
Click here to get the Fox News app
In his counterargument, the plaintiff said it would be unpopular to call a name.
The exchange sparked several topics online, including from experienced Court of Appeals Rafi Melconian, who focused on the exchange on social media.
Breanne Deppisch is a national political reporter for Fox News Digital, covering the Trump administration, focusing on the Department of Justice, the FBI and other national news.
Source link
