Newou can listen to Fox News articles!
The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued a stay that allows the Trump administration to move forward with plans to implement massive cuts to the federal workforce, and lifts a lower court injunction against the administration’s executive order.
In a 6-3 decision, the judge granted the emergency request filed last week by the White House, clearing the way in which Executive Order No. 14210 will come into effect while legal challenges arise in the 9th Circuit and potentially the High Court.
The order directs federal agencies to implement massive reductions (RIFs) and agency reorganizations.
The administrative authorities have been described as a legitimate effort to “rationalize the government and eliminate waste.” Critics, including unions, local governments and nonprofits, have alleged that the president is illegally circumventing Congress to dismantle much of the federal government.
Federal Court of Appeal Throws Roadblocks on Trump’s Education Reform Agenda
US President Donald Trump answers questions at a press conference regarding the recent Supreme Court decision at the White House briefing room on June 27, 2025 in Washington, DC (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
A majority of the courts stressed that they did not rule the legality of the reductions at certain institutions.
“The government has granted the application because it is likely that it will succeed in debate that the executive order and memorandum are legal, and because other factors related to whether or not to allow a stay are met,” the court wrote. “We have made no representations regarding the legality of the RIF and reorganization plans of an agency that has been prepared or approved in accordance with the Executive Order and Memorandum. The District Court has prohibited further implementation or approval of the plan, not an evaluation of the plan itself, based on its view on the illegality of the Executive Order and Memorandum.
A California district court blocked the order in May, calling it an overdue. However, the unsigned Supreme Court decision on Tuesday puts that injunction aside and pending appeal. The majority said the government is “highly likely to succeed” in defending the legality of the order.
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson forced his opposition, writing, “This court now considers it appropriate to release the president’s destruction ball at the beginning of this case.” She warned that executive action represented “a structural overhaul that deprived Congress of policy making privileges,” and prematurely condemned most of his performances with an emergency without fully understanding the facts.
Trump administrators ask Scotus to allow it to move forward with plans to cut the federal workforce
A majority of the courts stressed that they did not rule the legality of the reductions at certain institutions. (Nicolas Economou/Nurphoto via Getty Images)
“This unilateral decision to ‘change’ the federal government was quickly challenged in federal courts,” she wrote. “The district judge has made the theoretical decision that the evidence should be thoroughly investigated, examined applicable laws and prohibited executives from carrying out mandated restructurings, but reducing that temporary and practical harm was not a demonstration of enthusiasm for the Court’s illuminating the President’s legally suspicious behavior in the environment.”
An executive order issued in February directed agencies to prepare immediate plans for restructuring and labor reduction, including eliminating roles deemed “non-critical” or “non-legal mandatory.” The administration argues that it is a necessary response to bloated government and outdated structures, and that the injunction forces the “thousands of employees” to “preserve “the continuation of federal services is not included in the government and public interest.”
Unions and state officials opposed to the plan say it goes beyond normal workforce management and could break services across multiple agencies. They proposed a cut of over 50% at the Ministry of Energy and pointed out nearly 90% at the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice will raise official photos at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on October 7, 2022 (Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images)
The court’s decision is not a final decision regarding the legality of the executive order. We determine that implementation may proceed temporarily while the appeal continues. If the 9th Circuit upholds the injunction, or if the Supreme Court refuses to file a lawsuit later, the order could be suspended again.
The US Federal Government Employee Union states, “Today’s decision is a serious blow to our democracy, providing services that the American people rely on serious risks. This decision is to reorganize government functions, reorganize federal workers, and continue the constitution while we are permitted to continue without federal approval. We argue this case to protect the important public services we rely on to stay safe and healthy.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
The incident is the Trump vs. US Government Employees Federation.
“The US Supreme Court decision today is another decisive victory for the president and his administration,” White House Principal, Deputy Director Harrison Fields, wrote in an email to Fox News Digital. “We clearly repent the ongoing attack on the president’s constitutionally recognized enforcement power by leftist judges trying to prevent him from achieving government efficiency across the federal government.”
Source link
