A federal judge refused on Tuesday that billionaire Elon Musk and the government’s efficiency would immediately block access to government data systems and participation in workers’ layoffs.
US District Judge Tanya Chukkan found legitimate questions about mask authority but said there was no evidence of serious legal harm that justified the temporary restraining order.
The decision came in a lawsuit filed by 14 democracies challenging Doji’s authority to access sensitive government data. The Attorney General argued that Musk is wielding the kind of power that the constitution is held only by those elected or confirmed by the Senate.
The Trump administration has insisted that the layoffs come from the agency head, and despite his public efforts, Musk does not directly run Doge’s daily operations. He insisted.
Doge, blessed by President Donald Trump, uses computer systems from multiple agencies to dig into budgets and searches for what is called waste, fraud and abuse.
Chuccan recognized concerns among groups in the state, including New Mexico and Arizona.
“Doge’s unpredictable behavior has led to considerable uncertainty and confusion,” she wrote. Their questions about Musk’s apparent “unidentified authority” and the lack of Congressional oversight over Doge are justifiable, and they may be able to debate them well later.
Still, at this point, how Doge’s work will affect the state remains unclear exactly, with judges only issued courts and only orders blocking certain immediate harm. You can, she discovered.
Chukkan, who was nominated for Democratic President Barack Obama, had previously been overseen by Washington, DC’s criminal election interference case against Trump.
Source link
