[ad_1]
The former assistant chief of the Los Angeles Police Department won the victory in his efforts to continue working as a police officer after facing accusations of tracking his former romantic partner at Apple Airtag.
Alfred “Al” Labrada saw his Peace Officer accreditation recovered after an investigation by the Commission on Standards and Training for Peace Officers and then the state law enforcement accreditation. This result allows Labrada to retain a license to carry badges within the state.
His recognition was temporarily suspended on January 23rd due to an agency’s record called a “pending investigation” into his retirement and allegations of “fraud.”
According to the mail, Labrada was cleared on March 12 after the previous ruling was “rescissed by the executive director’s order” based on the findings of “clear and persuasive evidence.” [was] We haven’t seen them. ”
Labrada did not immediately respond to requests for comment through a spokesman.
In the fall of 2023, Labrada’s former romantic partner (also a LAPD officer) reported to authorities that he had secretly planted a GPS tracking device in her car.
After a police investigation into the allegations, San Bernardino County prosecutors refused to file criminal charges against Labrada, citing inadequate evidence.
Last spring, all CIVILIAN LAPD disciplinary committees discovered Labrada was guilty in seven counts related to the matter, including allegations that lied to interior detectives, and attempted to persuade the witness not to testify. Labrada retired rather than faced with an end.
His sudden departure marked a jarring coda for a departmental career of an ornamental officer, once considered a potential replacement for former Michelle Moore. Labrada then filed legal claims against the city, accusing Moore and others of showing anti-Latino bias and conspiring to block the chief’s path to work.
Despite the controversy, the Times discovered that Labrada is considered a candidate for LAPD’s main job.
Post office spokesman Meagan Poulos said “depending on the details of the incident,” and that agents could temporarily suspend the certification of officers during the investigation.
“The executive director has the authority to withdraw the suspension based on posting evidence,” Poulos said in an email. “Posts must meet a higher threshold of “clear and persuasive” to take any action. ”
Officers have the option of appealing ruling.
The 34 LAPD officers are included in a list of statewide executives facing potential recognition. 20 was found to have been completely revoked or not entitled to continue working as a police officer after being charged with serious misconduct, including drunk driving, embezzlement and sexual assault.
The other eight temporarily suspended their certification, and three officers voluntarily waived their licenses.
In 2021, California joined other states to enact laws that would create a process in which officers would be exempt for serious misconduct in order to prevent people who were fired or resigned during an investigation into fraudulent conduct from moving to another police agency.
Post-facto decisions are separate from criminal prosecution or punishment issued by the officer’s own department.
Dawn Silva, an officer who accused Labrada of tracking her, filed a lawsuit alleging that department leaders failed to protect her from backlash. She was also given a temporary restraining order against Labrada, prohibiting him from possessing firearms unless he meets certain conditions.
[ad_2]Source link
