[ad_1]
In 2010, California voters drove foxes from Henhouse, seeing lawmakers in Washington and Sacramento have no power to bring out the right legislative district for them.
It wasn’t nearby.
Passed with a biased margin of 61% to 38%, Proposal 20 concluded decades of pro-forma elections by giving Congress’s line drawing powers to an independent mapping committee and injecting much needed competition into California’s residential races.
Currently Gov. GavinNewsom talks about canceling voter handiwork.
Newsom said he might cancel the committee, tearing the boundaries it portrayed, and try to have Democrat partisans draft a new set of lines ahead of next year’s midterm elections.
The threatened move is a long shot, and more than anything, a trick to boost Newsom’s White House ambitions.
Also, reflecting the increase in rog arrogance among domestic lawmakers who are telling voters, “Thank you for your opinion. Leave now.”
Think about what happened in Missouri. Last year, 58% of voters approved the voting law, demanding that the state’s minimum wage be increased and employers be given paid sick leave. This month, Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe signed a law that would limit the minimum wage hike and completely eliminate sick leave requirements.
In two other states, Alaska and Nebraska, lawmakers tried like that, but failed to overturn voters’ pass on paid sick leave and minimum wage increases, respectively.
“When elected officials fear the will of their voters, it’s a typical awful charge of democracy,” said Alexis Magnan Caraway of the Fairness Project, a union-supported advocacy group focusing on state voting measures.
That’s true.
But it is part of a recent pattern of lawmakers in primarily Republican-led states, working to open up or roll back measures designed by voters to embarrass abortion rights, expand Medicare and raise the minimum wage.
To make it clear, these measures were passed by all striped voters, including Democrats, Republicans and independents.
“People transcend party lines to vote on issues that they know to affect their communities,” said Chris Melody Fields Figueredo, executive director of the Center for Voting Initiative Strategy, a progressive organisation. By ignoring or negating the outcome, lawmakers “contribute to what we see across the nation where we have lost faith in our system and government,” she said.
And if politicians don’t save their hearts to ask for votes, why are they elected time?
A direct attack on the initiative process makes it difficult and perhaps even impossible for citizens to take measures against the vote and ask for a popular vote, as at least nine state legislatures have passed or considered the law in their latest sessions.
As Sean Morales Doyle of the Brennan Center for Justice pointed out, direct democracy could be a problem.
“There are times when we can abuse the system to disrupt voters,” he said.
But that’s one thing to deal with those glitches, Morales Doyle said, and “We’re going to make it difficult for them to enact the policies they want, simply by representing voters and simply saying they don’t agree with what the best policies they think are.”
In Texas, Republicans are wielding biased power in the hopes of erasing up to five democratic seats, increasing the chances of GOPs in the 2026 midterm elections. Trump supports the overall effort as he looks at the prospect of a majority of democratic homes equipped with bravely summoned summoned summons.
That’s the reason for Fighting Firefire to tear down the map of California’s Congress and tear down the state gerrymanders for Democrats, just as Texas Republicans would like. “We can sit on the sidelines and talk about how the world should be, or we can recognize the existential nature that is in this moment,” the governor argued.
It is very difficult to oppose corrupting the false Trump and his Republican enabler. Still, that’s not a reason to ignore the will of California voters when it comes to handing over their own lawmakers.
There are two ways in which he could override Proposal 20 if he threatens Newsom’s Gerrymander threat at face value.
He hoped to break the law, win the passage of legislation portraying a new Congressional district, face inevitable lawsuits and win a favorable ruling from the California Supreme Court. Or he could call for a costly special election, asking voters to turn themselves around and eliminate the state’s nonpartisan constituency committee of constituencies, at least for the time being.
It’s a huge sale. Newsom’s message to Californians is, “I spend hundreds of millions of taxes so I can return it to politicians who work their own will in the back rooms of Washington and Sacramento.”
But that’s the point of what they’re asked to do, and it doesn’t have a small amount of hub arrogance on Newsom’s side.
When elections are important, especially as our democracy is wobbling, politicians must accept the outcome, whether they like them or not.
Otherwise, what is the key to election?
[ad_2]Source link
