Newou can listen to Fox News articles!
The war on terrorism led to an Iraqi change of government and a temporary democratic Afghanistan, at least until the tragic withdrawal of former President Joe Biden. More recently, another conflict between Israel and Iran has led the US to intervene to help destroy nuclear facilities, but observers need to pause before making an apple-app comparison between the two eras.
The image of then-Speaker of House White, Andrew Card, whispered to President George W. Bush’s ears during a terrorist-stricken elementary school reading event, continuing the US involvement in the Middle East for 30 years.
The Middle East and world writing were different places at the time, Steve Yates, a senior China at the Heritage Foundation and a national security policy scholar, told Fox News Digital.
Yates previously served in the Bush administration as the top national security adviser to then-President Dick Cheney. Most recently, he co-chaired the National Security of the 2016 RNC Platform Subcommittee.
Teams erupt in anger as Trump takes bold action against Iran’s nuclear threat
Left: President George Bush and Donald Trump, right. (Reuters)
“The world has changed so badly in 20 years,” Yates said when asked to compare the two administrations.
“And I think my perception of things has changed a lot because I was focusing on everything in the world as the main focus of what’s going on in China.”
During the Bush Period, the Chinese Communist Party was led by Hu Zintao. Yates was the “definition of boredom” compared to Xi Jinping.
Yates said the difference between there and the Middle East presents challenges for the United States.
President Donald Trump has awakened to essentially lead the first “post-globalist” presidency as the world.[ed] From the “Globalist Moment” since the 1990s.
“It wasn’t a factor in the early 2000s, and I think that context is essential to see how things are being processed now,” he said.
“Frankly, I’m a supporter of President Trump and that’s what he’s trying to do. I think it’s very clear that he’s willing to use his critical force when he decides it’s necessary.”
Middle Eastern US military could face an increase in threat amidst Iranian conflict
In the Middle East, American intervention during the war on terrorism led to the abdication of dictator Saddam Hussein, leading to decades of ground war.
Iran was led by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the more prominent president at the time. Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei has recently become a more prominent global figure than the current President Masoud Pezeshkian.
And while the war on terror led to boots on the ground, Yates revealed that Trump hopes to carry “fair shares” of risks and responsibility for what happens in the region to his Middle Eastern allies and Western-friendly neighbours.
“In that case, Israel was very clear. They don’t want American boots on earth. As far as I know, they don’t want much other than rhetorical support,” he said.
Yates foreshadowed that Trump made it clear he was ready to use “decisive American troops” when necessary to prevent Iran’s nuclear proliferation.
Top Democrats, after Iran strikes as the White House pushes back the story, media declares us in war
“That’s a clear purpose… it’s not a war of occupation, it’s not about to remake Iran with our image. [have] It characterized Iraq, whether fair or unfair. ”
“So I think the president navigated this with a deeper logic than most people would give credit.”
The question at this point in history is whether the “old world” acts on their common interest in supporting non-nuclear Iran or similar outcomes in a meaningful way.
He referenced the “EU-3” (three economic forces of Germany, Britain, France and Europe), and said that Tehran was previously a “mitigating force” in negotiations that allowed him to “easy sanctions” and allowed him to return to his promises.
Click here to get the Fox News app
However, the EU-3 model was unable to solve the problem, revealing that early 21st century diplomatic styles (often attracting the US into conflict) were no longer effective. Israel’s decisive response to October 7th emphasized this alone.
“I still have gratitude and respect for my colleagues who have returned to the Bush administration. We see a world in a fundamentally different place,” he said.
“And I give President Trump a pretty high mark on how he is a well-balanced stock.
Charles Kraitz is a reporter for Fox News Digital.
He joined Fox News in 2013 as a writer and production assistant.
Charles covers the media, politics and culture of Fox News Digital.
Charles is a Pennsylvania native and graduated from Temple University with a Bachelor of Arts in Broadcast Journalism. Story tips can be sent to charles.creitz@fox.com.
Source link
