[ad_1]
The Arizona woman was awarded $7.25 million by federal court in California after a day of magical magic in Harry Potter’s magical world, and her grandson ended in an ambulance.
Earlier this month, the ju-described plebet that 74-year-old Pamela Morrison suffered when she rode a banned journey with Harry Potter in September 2022. I discovered Hollywood, Universal Studios, who is in charge of the program. According to court documents, the harness failed to secure and slid as he stepped into solid ground through the moving passageway.
“The belt was still moving, so my feet were on it and… my other foot continued on to the stationary floor, which knocked me out of my feet,” Morrison said. explained about the falling of court documents.
At the trial, her lawyer, Taylor Cruze, said the fall was because the employee didn’t stop the aisle to travel, allowing the woman to leave the ride safely, and she temporarily blocked her. A report by Law360 that claimed to be injured involving the injury, says that the bathroom is independently used.
Cruze argued that stopping the belt was safe, easy and reasonable, but Universal City Amusement Park “keeps the ride moving no matter what” and seat 1,800 riders per hour Legal sites report that you wanted to achieve this goal.
Many cases took a few seconds of surveillance camera footage showing autumn.
The Universal Studios defense team claimed, according to the legal site, that the video showed Morrison focusing on her grandchildren rather than where she was stepping in, so autumn was her fault.
In court documents, the company’s lawyers stated that Morrison “has been exercised by her own protection, proper care, and that she has been exercised by reasonably wise people under the same or similar circumstances, and that she has been in the right position to protect her own protection, proper care. and claimed that precautions were exercised.”
Nevertheless, the ju umpire was unsettled and found that the theme park was responsible for creating the dangerous situation that led to Morrison’s accident.
Van Che, a safety expert at the Institute for Risk and Safety Analysis, said the ride design is dangerous as it requires you to step vertically from the moving passageway to a stationary floor.
“When you enter or exit a moving passage, it deprives pedestrian of walking stability even when you enter/exit the vertical direction of a moving passage,” he wrote in a review of the case filed in court. “Since plaintiff Morrison was walking sideways in the moving passage, she felt she was in a hurry to get off the moving passage, so the instability of her walking would have been great.”
Previous analysis showed that injuries while riding or going out were fairly common, accounting for around one of eight accident reports at theme parks in Southern California.
After the fall, Morrison was taken to a local hospital by ambulance, incurring considerable medical costs. According to court documents, she suffered from a fracture in her lower back and a significant tear in some of the muscles around her lower back.
According to court documents, the ju apprenticed $250,000 for economic damages, $2 million in past non-economic damages and $5 million for future non-economic damages.
[ad_2]Source link
