Newou can listen to Fox News articles!
First Fox: Senate Republicans hope that the Justice Department will investigate and potentially prosecute Jack Smith on whether the Justice Department “illegally took political action to affect the 2024 election” against President Donald Trump.
Sen. Tom Cotton, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Email Committee, accused Smith of trying to influence his ability as a special advisor under the Biden-led Department of Justice in a letter to representing special advisor Jamieson Greer, originally obtained by Fox News Digital.
Major Trump candidates stagnated by Senate Dem put pressure on GOP leaders
Special Advisor Jack Smith will speak to a media member of the US Department of Justice Building in Washington on August 1, 2023 (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)
“The special advisor’s office is tasked with ensuring that federal employees do not carry out partisan political activities under the guise of federal employment, so it is suitable to determine whether Smith has broken the law,” the Arkansas Republican wrote.
“Many of Smith’s legal actions do not appear to have rationale except for attempts to influence the outcome of the 2024 election, that is, behaviour that violates federal law,” he continued.
Smith investigated the handling of confidential documents that were taken by former Attorney General Merrick Garland and later revealed during Trump’s attack on Mar-A-Lago compounds to investigate allegations that Trump had tried to overturn the 2020 election results.
“Hour by the Hour”: Senate GOP wants to end Epstein’s drama, but Democrats haven’t let it go
Senator Tom Cotton will chair the Senate Intelligence Email Committee. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc, Getty Images)
Cotton listed four instances during Smith’s tenure, accusing prosecutors of increasing the dates of trial and releasing information “without a legitimate purpose.”
In one example, Cotton accused him of quickly following the trial date and ju-seeker selection of his case against Trump in connection with the August 2023 charges that were part of the 2020 election investigation.
The indictment included four accusations against the president, including conspiracy to fraud the United States, obstructing official cases, conspiracy to obstruct official cases, and conspiracy against rights.
Cotton argued that defendants usually have more than two years to prepare for such trials, noting that the selection period for the ju judge is scheduled just two weeks before Iowa members in 2024.
He also accused Smith of skirting the usual appeal process and “didn’t make it clear to him the rightful reason.” The court should grant his request when Smith demanded trial before Election Day when he visited Japan, and after hoping for a quick review by the Court of Appeal, Trump filed a petition with the Supreme Court to divert his defense to the District Court in December 2023.
How Trump’s “Non-Shrinkable Violet” DOJ is delving into Schiff’s mortgage transactions as legal dangers loom in
President Donald Trump will be in the Air Force on his way to Washington on July 29, 2025, when he left Aberdeen, Scotland, before speaking to reporters. (AP photo/Jaclyn Martin)
Cotton accused Smith of violating the Department of Justice’s “60-day rules.” The charges stemmed from a move that was briefly filed by Smith following the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity granted on September 26, 2024, just over a month after the election.
And the summary, according to Cotton, was “confident at this point by other procedures,” including testimony from the Great Jury, which was usually four times the length allowed.
Click here to get the Fox News app
“These actions were not standard, necessary or justified unless Smith’s true purpose was not to affect the election,” Cotton said. “In fact, during Smith’s special advisor’s tenure, he regularly used a pretentious and offensive legal theory to prosecute candidates for president. President Biden adds that President Trump was called “confined” during the election. ”
“Of course, President Trump has beaten Joe Biden, Jack Smith and all Democrats who armed the law against him, but President Trump’s astonishing victory doesn’t excuse Smith for his responsibility for his illegal election interference,” he continued. “Therefore, I ask the Special Advisors Office to investigate whether Jack Smith or his team members have acted illegally for political purposes.”
Fox News Digital reached out to Smith but did not respond immediately.
Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital, which covers the US Senate.
Source link
