The executive order signed last week by President Donald Trump, which calls for a review of the country’s election, now faces two legal challenges.
The Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Governors’ Association, and the Democratic leaders of the Senate and House of Representatives filed their own complaints after the initial lawsuit was filed Monday afternoon by the Campaign Law Center and the State Democracy Advocates Fund.
Both cases filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia require courts to block Trump’s orders and declare them illegal.
“The executive order seeks to impose radical changes in the way Americans register to vote, vote and participate in democracy. All of these disenfranchised legal voters and are not legal,” the Democrats lawsuit filed by the ELIAS Law Group alleges.
House Dem blocking VA candidates to protest Doge Cuts
US President Donald Trump will hold an executive order signed at an ambassador meeting in the White House Cabinet Office, along with staff Secretary Susie Wills (from left to right). Sergio Go, assistant to President Donald Trump and chief of the Presidential Office. On March 25th, 2025, Charles Kushner, a candidate for the French ambassador, Washington, DC (Win McNamee).
The lawsuit complains about “the president’s own design preferences” regarding “the president’s own design preferences” regarding “the congressional mandatory voter registration form,” “the president’s own design preferences” regarding “the president’s illegal efforts to support the president’s election field and oppose political rivals.”
The Attorneys have in orderly warned some of Trump’s requests, including evident requirements for voter registration and new voting deadline rules and new voting deadline rules.
Trump continues to attack elite institutions with his eyes on the third term – and many are in the caves
Christopher Prue, president of the Connecticut Voters Association Registrar Association, will move a new voter round from his office on Thursday, March 27, 2025 to the Registrar Registrar of Voters, to be redistributed to other towns in Vernon, Connecticut. (Jessica Hill)
“We believe this executive order is the most distant and continuous enforcement action taken in Republic history to ensure our election,” Trump told the Truth Social Post on the day he signed on March 25th at an ambassador’s meeting in the White House Cabinet Office.
The order also asserts the power that legal experts say the president does not have more than independent institutions. Its agency, the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, has set guidelines for a voluntary voting system and maintains a federal voter registration form, the AP reports.
The new vote count is drawn on Thursday, March 27, 2025 by the Voter Registration Office in Vernon, Connecticut. (Jessica Hill)
The DNC lawsuit highlights the role of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the government’s controversial cost-cutting arm.
It advocates data sharing requirements for orders, including instructing DOGE to cross-reference cross-reference data with state voter lists, violating Democrats’ privacy rights and increasing the risk of harassment “based on false suspicions that they are not eligible to vote.”
Election officials from several Republican states praised Trump’s orders, saying they could block cases of voter fraud and give them access to federal data to better maintain voter roles.
If the court determines that an order can be put in place, the changes Trump hopes could cause some headaches for election administrators and voters. State election officials who have already lost federal cybersecurity aid will need to spend time and money complying with the order, including the possibility of purchasing a new voting system and educating voters on rules.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Citizenship proof requirements can also lead to confusion and disenfranchisement of voter rights, as millions of eligible voting age Americans are not easily available to obtain appropriate documents.
In Kansas, which had the requirements for proof of citizenship for three years before it was overturned, state experts estimated that almost all around 30,000 people who were prevented from registering for the ballot while still being valid US citizens were eligible.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Source link
