[ad_1]
Celebrating Jimmy Carter’s legacy
Steven Wiseman, Senior Editorial Advisor at the Peterson Institute, joined MediaBuzz to discuss the life and accomplishments of the 39th president.
Mark Zuckerberg, who often bends to political winds, is exiting the fact-checking business.
And it’s part of a broader effort by Meta CEO to woo Donald Trump after a long and rocky relationship.
After an earlier outcry, Zack made a great show by declaring that Facebook would hire fact checkers to combat misinformation on the globally popular site. This was a clear sign that Facebook was becoming more of a journalistic organization than one where users passively posted their opinions (and pictures of dogs).
But it didn’t work. In fact, it led to further information suppression and censorship. Why should we trust a group of unknown fact-checkers working for one of the increasingly unpopular tech giants?
The messy behind-the-scenes maneuvering during the Trump administration’s transition could shape Hill strategy four years after January 6th.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and President-elect Donald Trump are standing side by side. (Getty Images)
Now, Zuckerberg has recanted the issue and announced his decision in a video to emphasize its serious nature.
“The problem with complex systems is that they make mistakes. Even if they mistakenly censor just 1 percent of posts. That’s millions of people. And we have too many mistakes and over-censorship.” Even with the recent elections, it feels like a cultural tipping point to re-prioritize speech. ”
Let’s jump in here. In this line about “cultural tipping points,” Zuckerberg freely admits that he’s following conventional wisdom — and of course, the biggest tipping point is President Trump’s election to a second term. And skeptics are painting this as a humiliation for the president-elect and his team.
President Trump threatens to file further lawsuits against media outlets to force ABC to pay $15 million to settle lawsuit
“Therefore, we will go back to basics and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying policies, and restoring freedom of expression on our platforms…
“We’re going to get rid of fact checkers and replace them with community notes already used in I wrote articles non-stop.
“We have tried to address these concerns in good faith without becoming the arbiters of truth. But fact checkers are too politically biased, especially in the United States, and the It has destroyed even more trust.”
SpaceX and Tesla founder Elon Musk speaks during a town hall with Republican candidate U.S. Sen. Dave McCormick at the Roxine Theater in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on October 20, 2024. (Michael Swensen/Getty Images)
It was Mr. Zuckerberg and former Twitter executives who banned Mr. Trump after the Capitol riot. This led to a number of pro-Trump attacks on Facebook, and the president-elect told me he reversed his position on the grounds that he saw banning TikTok as a greater danger because it would help Facebook.
Trump said last summer that Zuckerberg plotted against him in 2020 and that he would “spend the rest of his life in prison” if he did it again.
The president-elect summed it up with a post that read, “Zuckerbucks, stop it!”
Let me introduce some more comments from Z. “We are simplifying our content policies and removing many restrictions on topics that have nothing to do with mainstream discourse, such as immigration and gender. It’s increasingly being used to cut off and shut out people who think differently, and that’s going too far.”
That’s certainly true. I agree with that too. In 2020, social media outlets led by Twitter suppressed a New York Post article about Hunter Biden’s laptop, dismissing it as Russian disinformation, but a year and a half later, establishment media outlets suddenly said, “Hey, the laptop report was accurate,” he declared.
Donald Trump’s Tough Talk—Buy Greenland! Take back the Panama Canal! – Many rebel groups’ rebellion sparks
To be honest, people like Zuckerberg and Elon Musk (who is currently embroiled in a war of words with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer over allegations that Starmer covered up the gang rape of a young girl while he was chief prosecutor) People have immeasurable influence. They are the new gatekeepers. As so-called legacy media become less relevant, as seen in Jeff Bezos’ exodus of top talent from the Washington Post and the recent rise of podcasts, they control much of the public conversation. are. Yes, they are a private company that can do whatever they want.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer listens to a speech by Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves at the Labor Party Conference on Monday, September 23, 2024 in Liverpool, England. (AP Photo/John Super)
At yesterday’s marathon press conference, a reporter asked President Trump about Zuckerberg: “Do you think he’s responding directly with promises to the threats you’ve made to him in the past?”
“Maybe. Yeah, probably,” Trump said, twisting the knife a little.
Meanwhile, the CEO, who made the obligatory trip to Mar-a-Lago for dinner, took a number of steps to work with the new administration. And it doesn’t hurt that Mehta is spending $1 million on Trump’s inauguration.
Mr. Zack has appointed Joel Kaplan, a prominent Republican lawyer, as head of international affairs, replacing the former British deputy prime minister. On “Fox & Friends” yesterday, Kaplan said:
“We have a real opportunity now. We have a new administration and a new president who strongly supports freedom of expression, and that will bring about change. One of the things we have experienced is that the U.S. Having a president and an administration that promotes censorship just allows other governments around the world that don’t even have the protection of the First Amendment to really put pressure on American companies. The whole world would rebel against something like that.”
We will work with President Trump. Understood?
Additionally, Zuckerberg has added United Fighting Championship CEO Dana White to Meta’s board of directors. MAGA now has a say in the company because White is a longtime ally of President Trump.
In other words, understand the program.
Footnote: At a press conference where President Trump appeared angry about his latest legal battle and his planned sentencing, the president-elect said, in journalistic parlance, “military coercion” against two of his recent targets. ” was not excluded. .
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“Well, we need Greenland for national security,” he said. And Americans lost many lives building the Panama Canal. “Maybe there’s something we need to do.”
We have no intention of using military force against either side. But his answer stirred the pot, just as he knew it would.
Howard Kurtz is the host of FOX News Channel’s MediaBuzz (Sundays 11am-12pm ET). Based in Washington, D.C., he joined the network in July 2013 and appears regularly on Special Report with Bret Baier and other shows.
[ad_2]Source link
