[ad_1]
Kamala Harris doesn’t want to be the California governor this week where many candidates (and some voters) are having a happy dance.
However, her announcement on Wednesday that she was bowing from a race she had never entered officially sparked a gust of speculation that Harris was warming up for another run at the White House in 2028.
Whether or not Harris likes it or not, the possibility of being run by the former Vice President of XX chromosomes poses a perennial challenge. Can women win the presidency?
“This question is justified,” Nadia E. Brown told me.
She is a government professor and director of the Women and Gender Studies Program at Georgetown University. She points out that after the election, Democrats can’t understand who they are or what they represent. In that chaos, it may seem easy and safe to travel in 2028 on the route of “the straight, old man who fills the status quo”;
That may be especially true in the Trump era, but it appears that America’s increasingly vocal and empowered slices actually belong to the kitchen where women make sunwiches far from any decisions beyond turkey and ham.
Brown points out that even Democrats who show off their progressive values, such as how much they want to vote for a female president, may have the secret sexism that appears in the privacy of their voting booth.
After 2024, Harris’ defeat, and deciphering what it means, has caused a lot of “morning anxiety and agita.” “We’re all doing research, we’re all trying to understand this.”
The confused Democrats privately didized on their own emotions, while Republicans made race and gender the center of the platform. The party’s position on race has become painfully clear with the stance that all undocumented immigrants are criminals and deserve horrific detention in places such as “Wannial Catraz” and foreign prisons known for torture.
Republicans’ position on women are a bit obscured, but it’s reversed. Whether it’s a refusal to communicate to the public the claim that the only reason women attend college is to get “Mrs.” such as how Trump is included in the Epstein Files, the quick and brutal erosion of reproductive rights, or by far-right podcaster Charlie Kirk, degrees, Republicans keep little secret in the fact that equality is not part of their package.
Trump’s approval rating was ordered over immigration, but he won more than half of the popularity vote last fall. It’s a lot of Americans who agree with him or at least are not troubled by these later rights ideas about race and gender.
Add that reality, including our current California governor, to the enthusiastic pack of lovely, safe, democratic white people who line up with their chances in their oval offices.
“I’ve definitely seen and heard of consultants, but even anxious female donors say, “This may mean that we can’t run women.” “We’re looking forward to seeing you in the process of reproductive Freedom,” said Mini Timmaraju, president and CEO of grassroots advocacy group.
She also considers gender questions to be “logical.” Because it wasn’t by her, but “Is there two consecutive reasons why I lost to Donald Trump?
Tim Maraj clearly says that these losses cannot and should not be linked to gender alone, but if the margin is thin, gender cannot be ignored either.
Joseph Guibarghese, executive director of the progressive political organisation group that supported Bernie Sanders to the president in 2016, said gender and race are always factors, but he believes that a major issue will be their platform for any candidate in 2028.
Harris said, “It was lost not because she was a woman, she lost because she didn’t accept the economic populist message. And I think voters are angry at their standard of living being declining, and they are angry at controlling DC and enriching themselves.”
Greevarghese said he saw a building with opposing momentum among the party and voters – a desire not to play it safely.
“Whoever it is, men, women, gay, straight, black, white, Asian – candidates have to criticise this moment.
Professor Brown adds that it is too narrow to see the question of opportunities for female candidates just through Harris’ lens. There are many women who could jump into the race. Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are already two names in the mix. Brown added that outside candidates, such as women from a political dynasty (think Obama) and celebrities along the Trump line, could also move forward.
Harris’ criticism is the baggage that lost the election and how she handled the campaign and the media, and may not make the voters and another female candidate a dog in particular.
“I’m optimistic that Americans will vote for a female president, whether Kamala runs again or not,” Vanessa Cardenas told me. She is the executive director of American Voice, an immigration rights advocacy group.
Cardenas points out that Hillary Clinton has won over 65 million votes (winning the popularity vote), while Harris has surpassed 75 million votes. If the Latinos went to Harris, instead of breaking the continuous right shift, she would have won. Cardenas believes that Latino votes could change again in 2028.
“After President Trump’s chaos, cruelty and incompetence, Latino voters, like most Americans, will reward candidates who seem to be the most authentic and ready to fight for an alternative vision for America,” she said. “We believe that women and women of color can be trustworthy and forced to speak to the need for change rooted in the living experiences of our communities.”
Tim Maraj said the Democrats have perhaps one of the most robust primary elections these days, regardless of Harris’ decision. This is only good for the party and voters.
And instead of asking, “Can women win?” a better question would be, “Do we really want a system that doesn’t try them?”
[ad_2]Source link
